EQUAL TREATMENT UNDER THE LAW-A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT
Keywords:
Equality, Law, Discrimination, RightsAbstract
The goal of this study is to determine what the general principle of "right to equality" entails. The term "Right to Equality" requires no explanation because its meaning is self-evident, and it is one of our basic rights. However, there are some secret elements that need to be explained, and this research effort focuses on such points and exceptions that are permitted by our Indian constitution. It's also useful to understand why discrimination is tolerated under Indian law. Article 14 of Indian law guarantees the right to equality. It is one of the basic rights. It ensures that everyone has the right to equality before the law and equal protection under the law. It is not only an Indian citizen's right, but also a non-right. citizen's “The state shall of India,” reads article 14. No one is above the law, according to article 14. In the eyes of the law, everyone is equal
References
I. Article 14 of constitution of india,1949
II. Dicey- law of the constitution, co edn-p.193.
III. U.S.A- section 1of 14th amendment says.”no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of laws.”
IV. Burma-section 13
V. Eire- section 40(1)
VI. Chile-Article 10
VII. Jennings-Law of the constitution, P.49 (3rd ed.).
VIII. (1992) 1ssc,558: AIR 1992, sc 1632
IX. Indra sawhney v. union of India, ( 200)1 scc 168: AIR 2000 sc 498.
X. Charanjit lal chowdhury v. union of India, AIR 1951 sc 41.
XI. Sheo shanker v. M.P state of government, AIR nag. 58.
XII. State of west Bengal v. Anwar ali sarkar, AIR 1952 sc 75.
XIII. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. raj Narain, AIR 1975 sc 2299.
XIV. A.K Kraipak v. union of India, (1971)1 scc 457
XV. S.G Jaisinghani v. union of India, AIR 1967 sc 1427
XVI. Openion of justice Bhagwati in bachan singh v. state of Punjab, AIR 1982 sc 1325.
XVII. Article 361 of Indian constitution law.
XVIII. ( 1992 ) 1 SCC 645: AIR 1992 SC 999.
XIX. Chiranjit lal v. union of India, AIR 1951 SC 41.
XX. Abdul Rehman v. Pinto, AIR 1951 Hyd 11.
XXI. R.K . Garg v. union of India, AIR 1981 SC 2138.
XXII. Monoponies co.v. city of los angles, 33 cal app. 675
XXIII. Dattatarya v. state, AIR 1953 Bom. 311
XXIV. Yusuf Abdul Aziz v. state of Bombay AIR 1954 SC 321.
XXV. AIR 1957 Raj. 10
XXVI. AIR 1951 SC 226.
XXVII. Article 366 ( 24) .
XXVIII. Bhaiyalal v. Harikrishen singh, AIR 1965 SC 1557,1560: (1965) 2SCR 877.
XXIX. AIR 1981 SC 1829.
XXX. ( 2003 ) 6 SCC 611
XXXI. Peeria karuppan v. state of T.N., ( 1971 ) 1SCC 38: AIR 1971 SC 2085.
XXXII. AIR 1983 SC 130
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Education and Research Journal (IERJ)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
