Ashutosh Yadav, Shilpi Chhabra, Swati Aggarwal


The normative context suggests that GDP and Sustainability must complement each other as against the positive theory that brings in the confoundment regarding the two aspects being complement to each other. Sustainability is how a particular system remains diverse and productive. It thrives to make the system long lived and healthy. The underlying principle is to enhance the endurance of the existing processes so as to make proper space for the future requirements. Over last few decades, sustainability has promptly become prerogative issue for the economists, policy makers, environmentalists, and corporates. The main challenge in this embryonic arena is to gauge the impact of sustainability on every aspect of our economy. We have seen exceptionally good GDP figures in the recent years. This paper attempts to understand the linkages between GDP, the most common measure of economic growth and sustainability. The 2005 World Summit on Social Development identified three pillars of sustainable development, such as economic development, social development and environmental protection. For the purpose of our study, around 17 variables from these three different clusters have been analyzed using time series analysis and the variables with most significant impact have been considered to construct a robust economic model to understand the impact of these three pillars of sustainability on GDP. This paper concludes by suggesting that National authorities should endeavor to promote the internalization of sustainability costs so as to make GDP a better measure. Our analysis leads us to the conclusion that a self-sufficient and self-explanatory measure is desirable to ensure incorporation of sustainability and consistent growth in order to reflect true well-being of our economy. With the introduction of Green GDP in the current Five Year Plan, it can be expected that this measure fulfils all expectations. 


GDP, Sustainability, Green GDP, Economy, Society and Environment

Full Text:



• Adams W. M. (2006). The Future of Sustainability: Re-thinking Environment and Development in the Twenty-first Century, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland.

• Arrow K., Dasgupta P., Goulder L., Daily G., Ehrlich P., Heal G., Levin S., Maler K., Schneider S., Starrett D., and Walker B. (2004). Are We Consuming Too Much? Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 18(3), PP. 147–172.

• Barbier E. (1987). The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development, Environmental Conservation, Vol. 14( 2), PP. 101–110.

• Beckerman W. (1994).Sustainable Development: Is It a Useful Concept? Environmental Values, Vol. 3(3), PP. 191–209.

• Dasgupta P., Heal, G. (1974). The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 41, PP. 3–28.

• Hartwick J. (1977). Intergenerational Equity and The Investing Of Rents From Exhaustible Resources. American Economic Review, Vol. 67(5), PP. 972–974.

• Landefeld J. S., Villones S.M. (2009). GDP and Beyond: Measuring Economic Progress and Sustainability. Darft Paper. Department of Commerce Washington D.C.

• Markulev A., Long A. (2013). On Sustainability: An Economic Approach. Staff Research Note. Productivity Commission Canberra.

• Mobariz A. S. (2013). Green GDP and Sustainable Development: Transition to a Green Economy in Afghanistan. Academic Term Paper. SouthAsian University.

• Our Common Future. (1987). The Brundtland Commission report, World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

• Pezzey J. (1992). Sustainable Development Concepts: An Economic Analysis. Environment Paper No. 2, World Bank, Washington DC.

• Solow R. (1974). Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 41, PP. 29–45.

• Stavins R., Wagner A. F., Wagner G. (2003). Interpreting Sustainability in Economic Terms: Dynamic Efficiently Plus Intergenerational Equity. Economics Letters, Vol. 79, PP. 339–343.

• Stiglitz J. (1974). Growth With Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 41, PP. 123–137.

• Toman M. (1998). Sustainable Decision-making: The State of the Art from an Economics Perspective. Discussion Paper 98-39, Resources for the Future, Washington DC.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.