IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES USED FOR DENTAL IMPLANT - A REVIEW
Keywords:
Impression Techniques, Open Tray Technique, Closed Tray Technique, Digital Impression, CopingAbstract
With the predictable integration of implants, the emphasis is shifted towards precise prosthesis. Reproducing the intraoral relationship of implants through impression procedures is the important step in achieving an accurate, passively fitting prosthesis. When dealing with the impression restorations is accurate transfer of the relationship of the implant and /or any remaining dentition to the master cast. Several options exist when dealing with the impression in implant prosthodontics. Newer advancement in in taking impression in implant by digital method. Digital Implant Dentistry will have an enormous impact on the dental implant market in the near future because of the predictable results, more predictable cost, save time for both the patient and the dental team. This paper discusses the relative merits of different implant impression techniques.
References
I. Leonardo Moreira Cabral, Carlos Gramani Guedes. Comparative Analysis of 4 Impression Techniques for Implants. Implant dentistry2007; 16: 1-9.
II. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Penkner K, Polansky R, Sedaj B, Wegscheider WA. Comparison of the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system. J Oral Rehabil. 2000; 27:629-38.
III. Carr AB, Master J. The accuracy of implant verification casts compared with casts produced from a rigid transfer coping technique. J Prosthodont. 1996;5:248-52
IV. Burns J, Palmer R, Howe L, Wilson R. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89:250-255.
V. Masri R, Driscoll CF, Burkhardt J, Von Fraunhofer A, Romberg E. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analogue by impression materials in custom trays of different designs. J Prosthodont 2002;11:155-160.
VI. Carrotte PV, Johnson A, Winstanley R B. The influence of the impression tray on the accuracy of impression for crown and bridge work-an investigation and review. Br Dent J 1998;18:580-585.
VII. van Noort R. Introduction to dental materials. 3rd ed. Mosby, 2007.
VIII. Chee W, Jivraj S. Impression techniques for implant dentistry. Br Dent J 2006; 201: 429–432.
IX. Phillips K, Nicholls J I, Tsun M, Rubenstein J E. The accuracy of three implant impression techniques: a three dimensional analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9: 533–540.
X. Lee Y J, Heo S J, Koak J Y, Kim S K. Accuracy of dif¬ferent impression techniques for internal connec¬tion implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 823–830
XI. Lee H, So J S, Hochstedler J L, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100: 285–291.
XII. Kan J, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K et al. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 7–13.
XIII. Nobel Esthetics. Products and procedures manual. Nobel Biocare Services, AG, 2010.
XIV. Nissan J, Ghelfan O. The press fit implant impression coping technique. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101:413-4.
XV. Sang J. Lee German O. Gallucci. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes- Short Communication. Clin Oral Impl Res 2013; 24: 111–115
XVI. JaafarAbduo,Karl Lyons. Rationale for the Use of CAD/CAM Technology in Implant Prosthodontics- ReviewArticle. International Journal of Dentistry 2013 :1-8Article ID-768121
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 International Education and Research Journal (IERJ)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
