RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLITICAL FUNCTIONING OF SCHOOL PRINCIPAL AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE AS PERCEIVED BY SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS

Authors

  • Mr. Ankush S. Kamble Research Scholar, Department of Education, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Bhavan, University of Mumbai, Vidyanagari, Santacruz (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India- 400098
  • Prof. (Dr) Indu Garg Former Head, Department of Education, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Bhavan, University of Mumbai, Vidyanagari, Santacruz (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India- 400098

Keywords:

Political Functioning, Interactional Justice, Aided and Unaided School

Abstract

The aim of this research is to ascertain relationship between perceived political functioning of secondary school principals and interactional justice as perceived by secondary school teachers. Survey correlational method was employed. 597 secondary school teachers from Mumbai were the respondents. For gathering data rating scales were used. The obtained data were analysed using the MS Excel and Vassar stats.

The findings from the research revealed that there is a direct positive relation between political functioning and interactional justice as perceived by of secondary school teachers on the basis of school type and gender.

References

I. Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In J. C. Masters & W. P.

II. Greenberg, J. (1990b). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.

III. Janssens, M., Sels, L., & Van den Brande, I. (2003). Multiple types of psychological contracts: A six-cluster solution. Human Relations, 56, 1349-1378

IV. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of Fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard and M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp 43- 55) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

V. Kickul J, Lester WS, Finkl J (2002). Promise Breaking during Radical Organizational Change: Do Justice Interventions Make a Difference? Special Issue: Brave New Workplace: Organizational Behavior in the Electronic Age, Published by: John Wiley & Sons. J. Organ. Behav. 23(4):469-488

VI. Masterson SS, Lewis K, Goldman BM, Taylor MS (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Acad. Manag. J. 43:738-748.

VII. Bana, Z. and Khaki, J. (2015). Exploring Leadership Practices of Principals of Government Elementary Colleges of Education in Pakistan. International journal of Leadership in Education, v18 n4 p464-486 2015

VIII. Mette, I. M. and Range, B. G. and Anderson, J.and Hvidston, D. J. and Nieuwenhuizen, L. (2015). Teachers' Perceptions of Teacher Supervision and Evaluation: A Reflection of School Improvement Practices in the Age of Reform. Education Leadership Review, v16 n1 p16-30 Apr 2015

IX. Swapnisha, P. K. (2013).A Study on Managerial Effectiveness of Service Sector Managers with Special Reference to Emotional Intelligence. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35, 71-77

X. Cappetta, Rossella; Magni, Massimo (2015) Locus of Control and Individual Learning: The Moderating Role of Interactional Justice. International Journal of Training and Development, v19 n2 p110-124 Jun 2015

XI. Li, Yongzhan (2014) Building Affective Commitment to Organization among Chinese University Teachers: The Roles of Organizational Justice and Job Burnout Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, v26 n2 p135-152 May 2014

XII. Young, Laura E.; Horan, Sean M.; Frisby, Brandi N. (2013) studied Fair and Square? An Examination of Classroom Justice and Relational Teaching Messages. Communication Education, v62 n4 p333-351 2013

XIII. Zara Sabeen (2012) Managerial leadership and interactional justice perceptions: An exploratory study. African Journal of Business Management Vol.6 (45), pp. 11213-11220, 14 November 2012

XIV. Moorman, R.H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? J. Appl. Psychol. 76(6):845-855.

XV. Cropanzano, R., Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Exchange theory: interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874-900.

XVI. Reave L (2005). Spiritual values and practices related to leadership effectiveness. Leadership. Quart. 16:655-687

XVII. Fry L, W, Vitucci S, Cedillo M (2005). Spiritual leadership and army transformation: Theory, measurement, and establishing a baseline. The Leadership Q. 16: 835-862.

XVIII. Bass BM (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Basic Books

XIX. Bass BM, Steidlmeier P (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Q. 10: 181- 217.

XX. Weaver GR, Treviño LK, Agle B (2005). Somebody I look up to”: Ethical role models in organizations. Organ. Dyn. 34:313-330

XXI. Dr. Aglave, P. (2000).Research Methodology and Techniques. Nagpur: Vidya Publications.

XXII. Best, J.W. &Kahan, J.V. (2010).Research in Education (10th Edition). New Delhi: PH, Learning Private Ltd.

XXIII. Dr. Pandya, S.R. (2011).Educational Research. New Delhi: APH Publishing.

XXIV. Garret, H.E. (1958). Statistics in psychology and Education. New York: Longman, Green and Co.

Additional Files

Published

15-04-2017

How to Cite

Mr. Ankush S. Kamble, & Prof. (Dr) Indu Garg. (2017). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLITICAL FUNCTIONING OF SCHOOL PRINCIPAL AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE AS PERCEIVED BY SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 3(4). Retrieved from https://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/778

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2017): APRIL ISSUE, INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH JOURNAL

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 International Education and Research Journal (IERJ)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.