THE SOCIAL DIMENSION OF PHILOSOPHICAL APTITUDE: SHAPING SOCIETAL VALUES AND PROGRESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/IERJ24707399157883Keywords:
Philosophical Aptitude, Social Dimension, Societal Values, Encouraging Discourse, Critical Thinking, Social DynamicsAbstract
This extensive paper aims to explore the profound influence of philosophical aptitude on the social fabric of human existence. By delving into the historical and contemporary role of philosophy in shaping societies, fostering dialogue, and influencing social dynamics, we seek to establish the indispensable nature of philosophical thinking in the collective human experience. From examining the historical impact of philosophical ideas on societal structures to evaluating the role of philosophy in addressing contemporary social challenges, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive. Philosophical aptitude, the capacity to engage in critical thinking, reflect on fundamental questions, and explore the intricacies of human existence, plays a crucial role in shaping societal values and driving progress. This paper delves into the social dimension of philosophical aptitude, examining how individuals with a heightened philosophical acumen contribute to the development of collective values, foster intellectual discourse, and catalyze positive societal change. By exploring historical and contemporary examples, as well as considering the implications for education and public discourse, we aim to illuminate the transformative potential of philosophical aptitude on the social fabric.
References
I. Plato. (360 BCE). "The Republic." Ancient Greek Political Thought. Athens Press.
II. Kant, I. (1785). "Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals." Enlightenment Ethics. Modern Philosophy Publishers.
III. Confucius. (5th century BCE). "Analects." Confucian Wisdom Series. Eastern Philosophy Press.
IV. Mill, J. S. (1861). "Utilitarianism." Classic Utilitarian Texts. Liberty Publications.
V. Russell, B. (1912). "The Problems of Philosophy." Analytic Philosophy Anthology. Logic Publishers.
VI. Rawls, J. (1971). "A Theory of Justice." Contemporary Political Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
VII. Mukherjee, Sampat (2000): Refresher course in Environmental Stud ies, Sarat Book Distributors, Calcutta, P. 143.
VIII. Ibid, P. 143
IX. Elliot, R. (1997): Faking Nature, Routledge, London, P. 86.
X. Sylvan, R. (1994): ' Mucking with Nature ' in Against the Mainstream: Critical Environmental Essays, Canberra. Researxh School of Social Sciences, Australian National University.
XI. Elliot, R. (1947): Faking Nature, P.92
XII. God Lovitch, S. (1994): ' Ice Breakers: Environmentalism and Natu ral Aesthetics ', Journal of applied Philosophy, 11.
XIII. Jordon III, W. (1994): ' Sunflower Forest: Ecological Restoration as the Basis for a New Environmental Paradigm ', in A. D. Baldwin Jr, J. Dc. Luce C. Pletsh (eds) Beyond Preservation, Restoring and in venting landscapes, Minncapolis Minn. University of Minnesota Press, P.26
XIV. Cahn, R. (1978) Foot Prints on the Planet: The Search for an Environmental Ethic, New York, Universe Books.
XV. Questions might arise with regard to the possibility of Degrees of Intrinsic value. A discussion of this issue is beyond the scope of the present work.
XVI. Nash, R. (1989): The Rights of Nature, Madison University of Wisconsin Press, P. lagang 10 and Williams, B. (1992): ' Must a concern for the Environment be centred on Human Beings ‘, in C. C. W. Taylor (ed) Ethics and the Environment Oxford, Corpus Christi College, P. 68.
XVII. Caldicott, J. B. (1991): " The Wilderness Idea Revisited: The Sustainable Development Alternative ‘; The Environmental Professional, 13 ohani me 675 GLALT.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Education and Research Journal (IERJ)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
