• Dr. Priti Chaudhari Assistant Professor in, Department of Education [CASE], Faculty of Education and Psychology, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara- 390002


Inclusive education is based on the right of all learners to a quality education that meets basic learning needs and enriches lives. Focusing particularly on vulnerable and marginalized groups, it seeks to develop the full potential of every individual. The ultimate goal of inclusive education is to end all forms of discrimination and foster social cohesion. (UNESCO)

According to the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED-97) (UNESCO, 1997), the term Special Needs Education (SNE) means educational intervention and support designed to address SEN. The term “SNE” has come into use as a replacement for the term “Special Education”. The earlier term was mainly understood to refer to the education of children with disabilities that takes place in special schools or institutions distinct from, and outside of, the institutions of the regular school and university system. In many countries today a large proportion of disabled children are in fact educated in institutions under the regular system. Moreover, the concept of children with SEN extends beyond those who may be included in handicapped categories to cover those who are failing in school, for a wide variety of reasons that are known to be likely impediments to a child’s optimal progress. Whether or not this more broadly defined group of children is in need of additional support, depends on the extent to which schools need to adapt their curriculum, teaching, and organisation and/or to provide additional human or material resources so as to stimulate efficient and effective learning for these pupils. The shifting approaches to disability have translated into very diverse policies and practices.  The various models of disability impose differing responsibilities on the States, in terms of action to be taken, and they suggest significant changes in the way disability is understood. Law, policy, programmes, and rights instruments reflect two primary approaches or discourses: disability as an individual pathology and as a social pathology. Within these two overriding paradigms, the four major identifiable formulations of disability are: the charity model, the bio-centric model, the functional model, and the human rights model.


Dash, A. (1997). Impact of Adapted Physical Education on the Physical Fitness of Mentally

Retarded Children. Disabilities and Disabilities, 11(1): 9–15.

Jha, M.M. (2002). School Without Walls: Inclusive Education for All. Oxford: Heinemann

Lele, V. and A. Khaledkar (1994). A Study to Identify the Learning Problems of Hearing Impaired Children in Language Textbook (Marathi) of Primary Level and Development of Supplementary Explanatory (Instructional) Material to Improve their Uses of Language. Independent study. Nasik: Shrimathi Mai Lele Shravan Vikas Vidyalaya.

Mohit, A. (2003). “Human Rights Model and Access”, International Journal of Human Rights.

Quinn, S. and K. Ryba (2000). “Linking Inclusive Policies with Best Teaching Practices”, in D.Fraser, R. Moltzen, and K. Ryba (eds), Learners with Special Needs in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Dunmore Press.

Rioux, M.H. and Mohit, A. (2005). Human Rights Disability and Law: National Human Rights Commission, New Delhi.

Taneja, N. (2001). “The 93rd Amendment Bill: A Fraud in the Name of Rights to Education”.

Communist People’s Democracy, 15(47 and 25)–16.

Umadevi, M. R. (1997). Effectiveness of a Remedial Programme on Improving Reading Comprehension Skills among Dyslexic Children. Ph.D. Thesis. Kuvempu University.

UNESCO (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO (1997). International Standard Classification of Education. Paris: UNESCO.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Dr. Priti Chaudhari. (2016). MODELS OF DISABILITY FOR LEARNERS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 2(7). Retrieved from