A STUDY ON REPRODUCTIVE LIFE OF THE BENGALEE HINDU FEMALES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21276/IERJ24804135264606Abstract
Reproduction is the process by which new individuals of a species are produced and the genetic materials are passed through generation after generation (Tortora, 2003). The existence of a species is maintained through the urge for the reproduction. Pearl (1939) accounted the urge for reproduction as basic attribute of all living organisms. The expressive form of this urge for the reproduction could be accounted as reproductivity or fertility. The urge for the reproduction in human could not be expressed in its full strength due to several restrictive factors work on it. Demographically observed fertility or infertility is the result of a well-defined number of both biological and behavioural factors, which serve to mediate the influence of culture, society, economic conditions, living standards, and other similar background determinants on individual reproductive behavior (Frank et al., 1994). The hedonistic attitude of human for the reduction of fertility would be described through the "Demographic Transition Model" (DTM) which defines the transition from high birth rates and high death rates to low birth rates and low death rates as part of the economic development of a country from a pre-industrial to an industrialized economy (Thompson, 1929). In the present study an attempt has been made to understand the current status of the reproductive life of the contemporary Bengalee females and the effect of demographic transition as well as fertility transition on the same. Materials of the present cross sectional study comprises with 200 adult married Bengalee females belonging to different caste group lived in a semi urban region of west Bengal. Mean age of the population was 32.63 ± 10.64. The result shows a remarkable decadal change in the reproductive life of the population. Age at menarche seems to follow the secular trend to being decreasing when comparing with a data (mean age 12.79 ± 41.37 and 13.41 ± 1.48 respectively). Comparison with a previous work revealed that the rate of literate women, employed women, the family income etc have been increased noticeable. The number of contraceptive used or adopt family planning families has also been increased remarkably in comparison with the earlier data (64.5 % and 56% respectively). Accordingly the rate of live birth has been decreased. The present study also differs from the age at marriage and marriage conception interval (MCI). Thus the present work revealed that the females (mothers) as well as the couples are more conscious about their reproductive life and adopt different family planning methods. Sharp decadal changes on their reproductive life could also be noticed which may be the ultimate result of the demographic transition.
References
I. Alam N. Birth spacing and infant and early childhood mortality in a high fertility area of Bangladesh: age-dependent and interactive effects. J Biosoc Sci. 27(4):393-404 (1995).
II. Amin R., Mariam AG. Knowledge of family planning methods in Bangladesh, 1969-1979: trends and implications. Biol Soc. 3(4):171-9 (1986).
III. Bandyopadhaya SN. Reproductive life of the Bengalee female in the contemporary society. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Calcutta. (1992).
IV. Barclay GW. Techniques of Population Analysis. John Wiley and Sons. Inc. New York, London, Sydney (1958).
V. Benefo KD., Tsui AO., Johnson JD. Ethnic differentials in child-spacing ideals and practices in Ghana. J Biosoc Sci. 26(3):311-26 (1994).
VI. Bharati P., Basu A. Fertility, mortality and maternal anaemic status in a village population of West Bengal, India. Ann Hum Biol. 17(4):331-5 (1990).
VII. Biswas S. A note on the spacing between consecutive births of normally fecund women of a certain class of hospital population. Indian J Public Health. 16(1):11-20 (1972).
VIII. Cho NH., Kong SK., Lim JK. Recent changes in contraceptive use and fertility in Korea. Ingu Pogon Nonjip. 4(2):3-27 (1984).
IX. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Social determinants of human reproduction. Hum Reprod. 16(7):1518-26 (2001).
X. Frank O., Bianchi PG., Campana A. The end of fertility: age, fecundity and fecundability in women. J Biosoc Sci. 26(3):349-68 (1994).
XI. Graziottin A. Libido: the biologic scenario. Maturitas. 34 Suppl 1:S9-16 (2000).
XII. Jensen TK., Henriksen TB., Hjollund NH., Scheike T., Kolstad H., Giwercman A., Ernst E., Bonde JP., Skakkebaek NE., Olsen J. Adult and prenatal exposures to tobacco smoke as risk indicators of fertility among 430 Danish couples. Am J Epidemiol. 15; 148(10):992-997 (1998).
XIII. Kabir A., Ibrahim QI., Kawsar LA. Relationships between factors affecting contraception and fertility in Bangladesh. Int Q Community Health Educ. 24(1):45-53 (2005-2006).
XIV. Kadi AS. Age at marriage in India. Asia Pac Popul J. 2(1):41-56 (1987).
XV. Kapoor AK., Kshatriya GK. Fertility and mortality differentials among selected tribal population groups of north-western and eastern India. J Biosoc Sci. 32(2):253-264 (2000).
XVI. Kesmodel U., Wisborg K., Olsen SF., Henriksen TB., Secher NJ. Moderate alcohol intake during pregnancy and the risk of stillbirth and death in the first year of life. Am J Epidemiol.15;155(4):305-312 (2002).
XVII. Lema VM., Mtimavalye LA., Msiska FS. Socio-demographic characteristics of family planning clients and their possible influence on contraception in Malawi.East Afr Med J. 75(1):41-46(1998).
XVIII. Maharatna A. Fertility, mortality and gender bias among tribal population: an Indian perspective. Soc Sci Med. 50(10):1333-51 (2000).
XIX. Maralani V. “The Changing Relationship Between Family Size and Educational Attainment in Indonesia” California Center for Population Research Working Paper CCPR 017-004. www.ccpr.ucla.edu/ccprwpseries/ccpr_017_04.pdf (2005).
XX. Nath DC., Singh KK., Land KC., Talukdar PK. Age of marriage and length of the first birth interval in a traditional Indian society: life table and hazards model analysis. Hum Biol. 65(5):783-97 (1993).
XXI. Pearl R. The Natural History of Populaton. Oxford University Press, London. (1939).
XXII. Rele JR. Some Aspects of Family and Fertility in India. Population Studies, 15(3) :267-278 (1962).
XXIII. Sen T., Das B. Acceptance and non-acceptance of birth control methods and associated facts in rural areas of Midnapur district of West Bengal. Man India. 63(4):379-85 (1983).
XXIV. Sengupta J. Accessing modern contraceptive technologies in India. Indian J Physiol. Pharmacol. 50 (4): 327-40 (2006).
XXV. Sołtysiak E. The influence of socioeconomic factors on female fertility. Ginekol Pol. 76(12): 986-90 (2005).
XXVI. Syamala TS. Does Community Level Mortality Affect the Reproductive Performance of Women? Evidences from Goa, India. Anthropologist, 6(2): 119-123 (2004).
XXVII. Talukdar S. Patterns of fertility and mortality in four caste groups in West Bengal. Man India. 63(2): 151-63 (1983).
XXVIII. Thompson WS. "Population" American Sociological Review.34 (6): 959-975 .(1929).
XXIX. Tortora GJ., Grabowski SR. Principles of Antomy and Physiology. Tenth Edition, John Wiley and Sons. Inc. (2003).
XXX. Utomo B., Alimoeso S., Park CB. Factors affecting the use and non use of contraception. Majalah Demografi Indones. 10(20): ii-19-48 (1983).
XXXI. Yadava KNS., Yadava SS. Women's status and fertility in rural India. The History of the Family. 4:2 209-228 (1999).
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Education and Research Journal (IERJ)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
