TO STUDY THE IMPACT OF MEDIA MULTITASKING TO DRAW CORRELATIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT AGE SEGMENTS

Authors

  • Siddharth Gupta Research Scholars Program, Harvard Student Agencies, In collaboration with Learn with Leaders

Keywords:

Media Multitasking

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of media multitasking on cognitive, emotional, and behavioural well-being of individuals within the general Indian population Using digital technology as a tool for multitasking is known as ‘media multitasking’. This is becoming part of most age groups, from students to senior citizens for projects, work, entertainment, etc. Emerging research is showing significant effects, both positive and negative, of digital gadgets on humans.

Method: An online cross-sectional survey was done over a period of 4 weeks on two age groups in the Indian population. Group 1 (16-25 years old) had 127 consenting subjects (males-78, females-49), while Group 2 (45-55 years old) had 157 consenting subjects (male-71, female-86). An online form (with 12 non-demographic questions) was answered by both groups in relation to the role of digital gadgets while multitasking in their day-to-day work.

Result: A significant difference in the feeling of happiness was found in both groups (p = 0.004). The majority of participants in Group 1 (62.20%) with the younger population felt happy at the end of the day as compared to Group 2 (45.22%) while using media multitasking.

Conclusion: Our cross-sectional study shows that, in the Indian population, the younger generation (Group 1) is happier with media multitasking as a tool in their day-to-day lives as compared to the older generation (Group 2). The reasons were more personal time and achieving weekly targets (Group 1) as compared to less time for family and oneself (Group 2).

References

I. Chang, Y. (2017). The influence of media multitasking on the impulse to buy: A moderated mediation model. ScienceDirect. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563216309001.

II. Drody, A. C. (2022). Boredom and Media Multitasking. frontiers. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.807667/full.

III. Edwards, K. S. (2017). Media multitasking and implicit learning. Springer Link. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-017-1319-4.

IV. Kononova, A. (2019). Contrary to Myth, Older Adults Multitask With Media and Technologies, But Studying Their Multitasking Behaviors Can Be Challenging. PubMed Central. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6794278/#s26title.

V. Melina, R. U. (2015). Media multitasking and memory: Differences in working memory and long-term memory. Springer Link. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13423-015-0907-3.

VI. Ophir, E. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. PubMed Central. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2747164/.

VII. Rioja, K. (2023). Unravelling the link between media multitasking and attention across three samples. PubMed Central. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614709/#R36.

VIII. Wilmer, H. H. (2019). Wired to be connected? Links between mobile technology engagement, intertemporal preference and frontostriatal white matter connectivity. PubMed Central. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6523422/

Additional Files

Published

15-12-2023

How to Cite

Siddharth Gupta. (2023). TO STUDY THE IMPACT OF MEDIA MULTITASKING TO DRAW CORRELATIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT AGE SEGMENTS. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 9(12). Retrieved from https://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/3207