• Jordan Tovera Salvador University of Dammam


Critical Research Paradigm, Interpretive Paradigm, Paradigm, Qualitative Research, Scientific Paradigm


Various researchers employing either qualitative or quantitative researches should better understand the different competing research paradigms and its philosophical underpinnings in relation to ontology, epistemology, methodology and even the methods in collecting and analyzing data to produce an excellent research. Moreover, this paper uncovers the distinctive philosophical keystones of each competing paradigms of qualitative research: scientific, interpretive, and critical theory. In qualitative research, realities are multiple in nature and subjective; dissimilar to quantitative research there is only one objective reality.The qualitative researcher should be able to breach the objective separateness or distance between him and the participants to enter their subjective world for only then the researcher can fully well understand the experience of the phenomenon from the perspectives of the participants (emic perspective) and not according to his viewpoint (etic perspective). Thus, this article would help researchers to fully understand the nature, components, and uniqueness of each competing paradigms of qualitative research.


Bryman, A. (2008). The End of the Paradigm Wars?, in P. Alasuutari, J. Brannen, and L. Bickman (eds.), Handbook of Social Research. London: Sage.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.) New York: Oxford University Press.

Cohen, L,.Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education.(6th Edition). London: Routledge.

Cook, T., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand Mcnally.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: SAGE.

Crotty, M. (1989). The Foundations of Social Research.London: SAGE.

Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-117) London: SAGE.

Howe, K. R., & Moses, M, S. (1999). Ethics in Educational Research.Review of Research Education, 24, 21-59.

Scotland, J. (2012). Exploring the Philosophical Underpinnings of Research: Relating Ontology and Epistemology to the Methodology and Methods of the Scientific, Interpretive, and Critical Research Paradigms.English Language Teaching (Vol. 5 No. 9). Canada: Canadian Center of Science and Education. ISSN 1916-4742; E-ISSN 1916-4750.

Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, trans. A.M. Henderson and T. Parsons. New York: Free Press.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Jordan Tovera Salvador. (2016). REVISITING THE PHILOSOPHICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 2(6). Retrieved from