POGIL ENHANCES UNDERSTANDING OF BIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS

Authors

  • Lawrence O. Flowers Associate Professor of Biology Department of Biological and Physical Sciences Saint Augustine’s University

Keywords:

process-oriented, inquiry, active learning, engagement

Abstract

Process-oriented guided inquiry learning or POGIL is a learning model studied and shown to produce beneficial student educational and professional outcomes. This method is an active learning method that strives to encourage active student participation and focuses on career-related competencies. POGIL is a student-centered approach designed to promote group interaction and problem-solving. The role of the teacher in this active learning method is to serve as a coach and as a facilitator during student-led discussions. A condensed class lecture allows student groups to engage in conversations, leading to meaningful learning. This innovative learning tactic will not cause a financial strain on the institution and is appropriate for any science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) discipline. Initially, the POGIL approach was developed to improve chemistry courses. Since its inception, it has been implemented in other STEM courses in high school and college settings.
This brief article discusses the potential advantages of using this technique to improve biology majors’ understanding and application of essential skills needed in graduate school and beyond.
The incorporation of job-related skills training at the undergraduate level using POGIL can produce college graduates ready to take on the challenges of the 21st-century job market.

References

I. Bailey, C., Minderhout, V., & Loertscher, J. (2012). Learning transferable skills in large lecture halls:

Implementing a POGIL approach in biochemistry. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education,

, 1-7.

II. Blumer, L., & Beck, C. (2019). Laboratory courses with guided-inquiry modules improve scientific reasoning and experimental design skills for the least-prepared undergraduate students. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 18, 1-13.

III. Brown, J. (2020). Producing scientific posters, using online scientific resources, improves applied

scientific skills in undergraduates. Journal of Biological Education, 54, 77-87.

IV. Brown, P. (2010). Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning in an introductory anatomy and

physiology course with a diverse student population. Advances in Physiology Education, 34, 150-

V. Felege, C., & Ralph, S. (2019). Evaluating the efficacy of a student-centered active learning environment for undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) classroom for major and non-major biology students. Journal of Biological Education, 53, 98-109.

VI. Hein, S. (2012). Positive impacts using POGIL in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education,

, 860-864.

VII. Irwanto, S., Anip, D., Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. (2018). Promoting critical thinking and problem solving skills of preservice elementary teachers through process-oriented guided-inquiry learning (POGIL). International Journal of Instruction, 11, 777-794.

VIII. Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41,

-218.

IX. Minderhout, V., & Loertscher, J. (2007). Lecture-free biochemistry: A process oriented guided

inquiry approach. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 35, 172-180.

X. Moog, R., Creegan, F., Hanson, D., Spencer, J., & Straumanis, A. (2006). Process-oriented guided

inquiry learning: POGIL and the POGIL project. Metropolitan Universities, 17, 41-52.

XI. Mulligan, E. (2014). Use of a modified POGIL exercise to teach bacterial transformation in a

microbiology course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 15, 30-32.

XII. Murray, T. (2014). Teaching students to read the primary literature using POGIL activities.

Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42, 165-173.

XIII. Myers, T., Monypenny, R., & Trevathan, J. (2012). Overcoming the glassy-eyed nod: An application of process-oriented guided inquiry learning techniques in information technology. Journal of

Learning Design, 5, 12-22.

XIV. Pellas, N., Dengel, A., & Christopoulos, A. (2020). A scoping review of immersive virtual reality in

STEM education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13, 748-761.

XV. Reynders, G., & Ruder, S. (2020). Moving a large-lecture organic POGIL classroom to an online

setting. Journal of Chemical Education, 97, 3182-3187.

XVI. Rodriguez, J., Hunter, K., Scharlott, L., & Becker, N. (2020). A review of research on process oriented

guided inquiry learning: Implications for research and practice. Journal of Chemical Education,

, 3506-3520.

XVII. Roller, M., & Zori, S. (2017). The impact of instituting process-oriented guided-inquiry learning

(POGIL) in a fundamental nursing course. Nurse Education Today, 50, 72-76.

XVIII. Shu, Y., & Huang, T. (2021). Identifying the potential roles of virtual reality and STEM in maker

education. Journal of Educational Research, 114, 108-118.

XIX. Soltis, R., Verlinden, N., Kruger, N., Carroll, A., & Trumbo, T. (2015). Process-oriented guided

inquiry learning strategy enhances students' higher level thinking skills in a pharmaceutical

sciences course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79, 1-8.

XX. Toyo, E., Aji, S., & Sundaygara, C. (2019). The effect of POGIL model toward science process

skills and physics acquisition of student. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7, 157-163.

XXI. Vincent-Ruz, P., Meyer, T., Roe, S., & Schunn, C. (2020). Short-term and long-

term effects of POGIL in a large-enrollment general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical

Education, 97, 1228-1238.

Additional Files

Published

15-08-2021

How to Cite

Lawrence O. Flowers. (2021). POGIL ENHANCES UNDERSTANDING OF BIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 7(8). Retrieved from https://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/2335