• Vikas Student Master of Physiotherapy in Neurology
  • Dr. Shefali Kapoor Associate Professor Prem Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation College
  • Dr. Neha Assistant Professor Prem Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation College


shoulder pain, post stroke, hemiplegia, russian current, physical therapy, shoulder function


Objective: - This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Russian current on shoulder pain and function in chronic hemiplegic patient.

 Methods: - A experimental study was done with 30 patients divided in to two groups. Patient in group A (control group) and group B (experimental group) were assessed and informed consent were taken. Patient in group A were given 20 minutes conventional exercise therapy and in group B were given Russian current stimulation in addition of conventional exercise therapy program. Treatment was given for three times a week for 4 weeks. Data were collected by means of Visual Analogue Scale for pain and Upper Extremity Functional Index for shoulder function.

Result: - After completion of 4 weeks treatment the post treatment mean values for VAS between group A and group B was 2.80±0.941 SD, 1.87±0.915 SD, respectively. And post treatment mean values for UEFI between group A and group B was 44.87±5.462 SD, 50.33±5.839 SD respectively.  

Conclusion: - Russian current stimulation along with conventional exercise therapy showed improvement in shoulder function and reduction of shoulder pain in chronic hemiplegic patient.


I. Van ouwenaller e, Laplace P, Chantraine A. Painful shoulder in Hemiplegia Arch.phys med Rehabil 1986; 46:23-6.

II. Faghri PD, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM, Bors JG, Ho C, Akhuota P. The effect of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:73-9.

III. M. Murie-Fernández et al. Painful hemiplegic shoulder in stroke patients: Causes and management. Neurología. 2012; 27(4):234—244.

IV. Moskowitz E. Complications in the rehabilitation of hemiplegic patients. Med Clin North Am. 1969; 53:541—59.

V. Nakayama H, Stig Jørgensen H, Otto Raaschou H, Skyhøj Olsen T. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan 21;75(4):394–8.

VI. Griffin GW. Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain. Phys Ther 1986; 12:1884-93.

VII. Paci M, Nannetti L, Rinaldi LA. Glenohumeral subluxation in hemiplegia: an overview. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005; 42: 557—68.

VIII. Young youl you, Jing jang her et al. the effect of stretching and joint stabilization exercise on the improvement of spastic shoulder function in hemiplegic patient, J.Phys.Ther.Sci.2014; 26:491-495.

IX. Alex R Ward, Nataliya Shkuratova. Russian Electrical Stimulation: The early experiments. Physical Therapy Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association, 2002; 82: 1019-1030.

X. Johnson DH, Thurston P AP. The Russian technique of faradism in the treatment of chondromalacia patellae. Physiotherapy Canada. 1977; 29:266–268.

XI. Amr Almaz Abdel –Aziem, Emad Tauifik Ahmed, effect of Russian current stimulation on quadriceps strength of patient with Burn, International Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences. 2013; 2(2):123-130.

XII. Basanta Kumar Nanda. Medium frequency current chapter no.13, textbook of Electrotherapy Simplified second edition; 240-256.

XIII. Anand B Heggannavar, Snehal R Dharmayat et al. Effect of Russian current on quadriceps muscle strength in subject with primary osteoarthritis of knee: A Randomized control trial International Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences. 2014; 2(3):550-560.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Vikas, Dr. Shefali Kapoor, & Dr. Neha. (2021). TO STUDY THE EFFECT OF RUSSIAN CURRENT ON SHOULDER PAIN AND FUNCTION IN CHRONIC HEMIPLEGIC PATIENT. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 7(6). Retrieved from