SACROSANCT OR SECULAR? : A CRITICAL STUDY OF EMILE DURKHEIM’S FUNCTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE ON RELIGION

Authors

  • Sukriti Bhukkal Research Scholar, Ph.D., Panjab University, Chandigarh

Keywords:

religion, society, function, totem, collectivism, conflict

Abstract

Among the schools of thought on religion that have developed within the purview of sociology, functionalism has been associated with Emile Durkheim. It describes religion with regard to the requirements of the society and the role it plays in their fulfillment. Religion is a dichotomous concept and tends to rely on the differentiation between two categories of the sacred and the profane. The system of mystical attachment with an object whether animate or inanimate, is actually the veneration of the society itself. Totemism finds its expression amidst the Australian Aborigines and the tribal in India. Shared core principles and value consensus are essential for the existence of the society in its cohesive form.  While religion reinforces the interdependence of individual entities within a society and has exhibited unifying characteristics, it also has been a source of division and a cause of friction.  Despite what may seem sometimes to be a dysfunctional role, religion and the functional status ascribed to it  continues to be relevant especially, in simpler or even in modern contexts and provides a basis for further comprehension.

References

I. Allen, Kieran. (2017): Durkheim: A Critical Introduction. 1st ed., Pluto Press. London. pp. 106-131.

II. Amirthalingam.M.(2014): Significance of Totemism among the Tribes of India, available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312176533_Significance_of_Totemism_among_the_Tribes_of_India, accessed 23 Jan 2021.

III. Bottomore, T.B. (1976). Sociology as Social Criticism. 1st ed.,Routledge Revivals, Oxfordshire.

IV. Cuff, E. C., W. W. Sharrock & D. W. Francis. (1992). Perspectives in Sociology, 3rd ed. Routledge, London.

V. Da Silva, Filipe Carreira.(2019): The Politics of the Book : A Study on the Materiality of Ideas, Elementary Forms and the Cultural Durkheim. 1st ed., Penn City University Press. Pennsylvania, pp.17-42.

VI. Durkheim, É., Swain, J. W. (2012). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, Dover Publications, United States of America.

VII. Giddens, Anthony.(1971). Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

VIII. Maryanski, A. (2014). The Birth of the Gods: Robertson Smith and Durkheim's Turn to Religion as the Basis of Social Integration. Sociological Theory, 32(4), pp. 352-376.

IX. Ritzer, George. (1992). Sociological Theory, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

X. Zeitlin, Irving M. (1990). Ideology and the Development of Sociological Theory, 4th ed., Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.

Additional Files

Published

15-01-2021

How to Cite

Sukriti Bhukkal. (2021). SACROSANCT OR SECULAR? : A CRITICAL STUDY OF EMILE DURKHEIM’S FUNCTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE ON RELIGION. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 7(1). Retrieved from https://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/2222