Neha Arora


Previous studies on implicit theories of intelligence have largely been done to prove the hypothesis that incremental theories are adaptive whereas entity theories are maladaptive. Moreover, these studies have viewed psychological disengagement (adopted by entity theorists) negatively by calling it a self-handicapping strategy. They have only tried to answer, “how” endorsing a particular theory results in adaption or maladaptation.  It is worth noting that since these theories have emerged in the dominant American culture, the researchers have assumed the significance of a particular domain as given. They have completely ignored the dimension of power and resistance in their definition of adaptation.

This paper attempts to answer the “why” aspect of endorsing a particular implicit theory. No theory in the past has focused on why some people endorse entity and others incremental. It is argued here that the methodological framework of research on the adaptive/maladaptive value of any implicit theory of intelligence should allow the researcher to question/challenge the taken for granted assumptions inherent in mainstream educational discourse such as desirability of goal, the best strategy to achieve such goals. Therefore, the resistance perspective seems an appropriate methodological framework as it looks at psychological disengagement as a form of resistance. Taking adaptation in a broader sense and including such aspects as compliance and resistance in it, gives a chance to look at the adaptive value of those who endorse entity view. This paper provides some useful insights for the future research in the domain of implicit theories of intelligence.


implicit theories, adaptation, self-handicapping strategies, psychological disengagement

Full Text:



[I] Albee, G. W. (1986). Toward a just society: Lessons from observations on the primary prevention of psychopathology. American Psychologist, 41, 891-898.

[II] Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002).Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on african american college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 38, 113–125.

[III] Avis, J. (2002). Social capital, collective intelligenge and expansive learning: thinking through the connections, education and the economy. British Journal of Educational Studies.

[IV] Baritz, L. (1974). The Servants of Power: A History of the Use of Social Science in American Industry. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

[V] Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, Vol. 78, 246-263.

[VI] Breen, S. Cleary, J. and O'Shea, A. (2007). Mathematics Education Experiences. IMTA Newsletter 107, 40-44.

[VII] Burnette, J.L.; O’Boyle, E.; Vanepps, E.M; Pollack, J.M. and Finkel, E. J. (2012). Mindsets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self regulation. Psychological bulletin.

[VIII] Caudroit, J. and Stephan, Y., Brewer, B.W, Scanff, C.L. (2010). Contextual and individual predictorsof psychological disengagement from sport during a competitive event, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 40 (8). 1999-2018.

[IX] De Castella, K. and Byrne, D. (2015). My Intelligence may be more Malleable than yours: The Implicit theories Self-Form is a better predictor of Achievement and Motivation. The Journal of Educational Psychology.

[X] Denton, R.M., Kahn, K., Chan, W. (2008). Can fixed views of ability boost performance in the context of favourable stereotypes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol.44. 1187-1193.

[XI] Dweck, C. S., & Bempechat, J. (1983). Children's theories of intelligence. In S. Paris, G. Olsen, & H. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom pp. 239-256. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

[XII] Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review,Vol. 95(2), 256-273.

[XIII] Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Essays in social psychology,Vol. 13, New York, NY: Psychology Press.

[XIV] Dweck, C. S.; Chiu, C. Y.; Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit Theories: Elaboration and Extension of the Model. Psychological Inquiry,Vol. 6 (4), 322–333.

[XV] Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: Vol. 1. An introduction. New York : Random House.

[XVI] Graham, S. (1995). Implicit theories as conceptualized by an attribution researcher. Psychological Inquiry, Vol.6 (4), 294-297.

[XVII] Grant, H. and Dweck,C.S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 85 (3), 541-553.

[XVIII] Haslam, S.A; Reicher, S.D. & Platow, M.J. (2010) The new psychology of leadership: identity, influence and power. New York: Psychology Press

[XIX] Harackiewicz, J.M. & Elliot,A.J. (1995). Life is a roller coaster when you view the world through entity glasses. Psychological Inquiry. Vol.6(4).

[XX] Henderson, V., & Dweck, C. S. (1990). Motivation and Achievement. In S. Feldman and G. Elliot (Eds.), At The Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[XXI] Hernstein, R. and Murray, C. (1995) The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (Glencoe: Ill. The Free Press).

[XXII] Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588- 599.

[XXIII] Hoffman, D. (2010). Turning power inside out: reflections on resistance from the (anthropological) field. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, Vol. 12(6), 671-687.

[XXIV] Hong, Y.-y., Chiu, C.-y., & Dweck, C. S. (1995). Implicit theories of intelligence: Reconsidering the role of confidence in achievement motivation. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 197–216). New York: Plenum Press.

[XXV] Kincheloe, J.L., Steinberg, S.R., Villaverde, L. (2013). Rethinking intelligence: confronting psychological assumptions about teaching and learning. New York, Routledge.

[XXVI] Leistyna, P. (2000). The personality Vacuum: abstracting the social from the psychological in Kincheloe, J.L., Steinberg, S.R., Villaverde, L. (2013). Rethinking intelligence: confronting psychological assumptions about teaching and learning. New York, Routledge.

[XXVII] Mangels, J. A.; Butterfield, B.; Lamb, J.; Good, C.; Dweck, C. (2006). "Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model". Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.Vol. 1 (2), 75–86.

[XXVIII] Niiya, Y., Crocker, J., & Bartmess, E. (2004). From vulnerability to resilience: Learning orientations buffer contingent self-esteem from failure. Psychological Science, Vol. 15, 801-805.

[XXIX] Nussbaum, A.D. and Steele, C.M. (2007). Situational disengagement and persistence in the face of adversity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43, 127–134

[XXX] Ogbu, J. (1978) Minority education and caste: the American sytem in cross-cultural perspective. NewYork, Academic Press.

[XXXI] Peterson, C. (1995). Entity and incremental world views: some lessons from learned helplessness theory and research. Psychological Inquiry,Vol.6 (4), 307-311.

[XXXII] Quintanilla, V.D. (2012). Judicial mindsets: The social psychology of implicit theories and the law. Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 90 (2), Issue 3.

[XXXIII] Regner, I., & Loose, F. (2006). Relationship of sociocultural factors and academic self-esteem to school grades and school disengagement in North African French adolescents. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 45, 777–797.

[XXXIV] Reicher, S. and Haslam, S.A. (2010). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: the BBC prison study. British Journal of Social Psychology. 45, 1-40.

[XXXV] Richardson, T and Johanningmeier E.V. (1997). Intelligence testing: the legitimation of a meritocratic educational science. International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 27 (8), 699-714.

[XXXVI] Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world versus changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37.

[XXXVII] Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235-294.

[XXXVIII] Schmader, T.; Major, B. and Gramzow, R.H. (2001). Coping with the ethnic stereotypes in the academic domain: perceived injustice and psychological disengagement. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 57 (1), 93-111.

[XXXIX] Scott, J. (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

[XL] Shih, S. S. (2009). An examination of factors related to Taiwanese adolescents‘ reports of avoidance strategies. The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 102,377-388. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.5.377-388

[XLI] Steinberg, L. (1996). Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and whatparents need to do. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

[XLII] Tougas, F., Rinfret, N., Beaton, A. M., & de la Sablonnière, R. (2005). Policewomen acting in self-defense: Can psychological disengagement protect self-esteem from the negative outcomes of relative deprivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 88, 790–800.

[XLIII] Tomic, W. and Kingma J. 1998. Inroduction: Issues in the malleability of Intelligence; Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice; Volume 5; Pgs 1-12.

[XLIV] Tomasik, M.J., Silbereisen, R.K. and Heckhausen, J. (2010). Is it adaptive to disengage from the demands of social change? Adjustment to developmental barriers in opportunity-deprived regions, Motivation Emotion, Vol. 34, 384-398.

[XLV] Turner, J. C., & Brown, R. J. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 201–234). London: Academic Press.

[XLVI] Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theoryof motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

[XLVII] Weinstein, R. (2005). Reaching higher: The power of expectations in schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[XLVIII] Willis. P. (1981) Learning to labor: how working class kids get working class jobs.New York, Teachers College Press cited in Foley, D. 2004. Ogbu’s theory of adademic disengagement: its evolution and its critic. Intercultural Education. Vol. 15(4).


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.