REVIEWING THE ‘REVISED ICT@SCHOOL’ POLICY IN INDIA: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES ON EDUCATIONAL ECO-SYSTEMS
Keywords:Education technology, new public management, governance, India, government schools
Drawing the importance of technology in 21st Century, India re-launched the ICT@School Scheme in 2010 to formalise computer education among government schools. However, this giant step in introducing and institutionalising digital education in India should not be seen in isolation from the larger political scenario. The article elaborates on how international and country politics influenced the formulation of this scheme. Further, the article explains how the scheme opened doors for new public management into Indian education system and thereby explaining unintentionally interruption in the existing eco-system at both micro (school) and meta (educational governance system) levels. It concludes with the call for an appropriate and context specified partnership for governance and implementation of holistic education including digital technology.
[I] Alestalo, M. .. (2001). Is knowledge based society a relevant strategy for civil society. Current Sociology, pp. 203–218.
[II] Avalos, B. (2004). Teacher regulatory forces and accountability policies in Chile: from public servants to accountable professionals. Research Papers in Education, 19(1), 67-85.
[III] Bajwa, G. S. (2003). ICT policy in India in the era of liberalisation: its impact and consequences . GBER.
[IV] Balachandran, M. (2015). Use of Information and Technology in Secondary schools. New Delhi : Education Quality Foundation of India.
[V] Banathy, B. H. (1991). Systems Design of Education: A Journey to Create the Future. In N. Englewood Cliffs (Ed.), Systems Design of Education: A Journey to Create the Future. Educational Technology Publications.
[VI] Betts, F. (1992, November ). How Systems Thinking Applies to Education. Improving School Quality, pp. 38-41.
[VII] Brodkin, E. (2008). Accountability in Street-Level Organizations. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 317-336.
[VIII] DEA, D. o. (2018). Public Private Partnership in India. Retrieved December 8, 2019, from https://www.pppinindia.gov.in/overview
[IX] Department of School Education and Literacy, M. (2010). Revised ICT@Schools Scheme. Retrieved November 12, 2019 , from https://ictschools.ncert.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ICTscheme.pdf
[X] DLN, d. N. (2008, August 1). MAGAZINEICT in School Education. Retrieved November 20 , 2019 , from https://digitallearning.eletsonline.com/2008/08/ict-in-school-education/
[XI] Dubey, J. (2019). Disinvestment got boost under Vajpayee-led NDA govt. Here’s how public sector companies fared post-privatisation. New Delhi : India Today .
[XII] Hood, C. &. (2004). The middle aging of new public management. Into the age of the paradox. Journal of Public Administration and Research, 14(3), 267–282.
[XIII] James, O. (2005). The Rise of Regulation of the Public Sector in the United Kingdom. Sociologie du Travail, , 47, 323–339.
[XIV] Jha, N. &. (2016). Digitization of Indian Education Process: A Hope or Hype. . IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 18 , 131-139.
[XV] Jouko Sarvi, V. B. (2015). PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION. Phillipines: Asian Development Bank.
[XVI] Kalita, K. (2019). Over 40,000 contractual teachers protest education minister's 'driver' remark. Guwahati: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/.
[XVII] Liff, R. (2014). Unintended Consequences of NPM Drive the “Bureaucracy”’. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(8 ), 474-483.
[XVIII] Mahashevta. (2017). REVIEW OF ICT POLICIES IN INDIA. BHARTIYAM INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION & RESEARCH, 7(1).
[XIX] Majone, G. (1997). From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. . Journal of Public Policy, 17, 139-167.
[XX] Manuel Castells, G. C. (2005). The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy (1 ed.). Washington D. C.: Johns Hopkins Center for.
[XXI] McTaggart, D. a. (2015). Public Sector Reform. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74, 13-22.
[XXII] MHRD. (2019). Draft National Education Policy 2019 . Retrieved November 17, 2019 , from https://mhrd.gov.in: https://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/Draft_NEP_2019_EN_Revised.pdf
[XXIII] MHRD, D. o. (2016). Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Retrieved December 8, 2019, from https://mhrd.gov.in/ict_overview
[XXIV] Morrison, J. a. (2004). The Future of Learning Technologies. Innovate , 1(1).
[XXV] Murphy, M. &. (2003). Partners in participation: Integrated approaches to widening access in higher education. European Journal of Education, 38(1), 25-39.
[XXVI] PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2010). Survey of ICTs for Education in India and South Asia, Country Studies . Retrieved November 16, 2019 , from http://www.infodev.org/infodev-files/resource/InfodevDocuments_879.pdf
[XXVII] Sahoo, R. (. (2019 ). Functioning of ICT@School Scheme at Secondary Level. New Delhi .
[XXVIII] Singhal, P. (2019, September 17). Computer teachers protesting for permanent jobs lathi-charged in Panchkula. Retrieved November 15, 2019, from https://indianexpress.com/article/chandigarh/computer-teachers-protesting-for-permanent-jobs-lathi-charged-in-pkula-6001649/
[XXIX] Tata Trusts, I. f. (2018). ICT implementation in school education in India. Bengaluru: IT for Change.
[XXX] tribune, t. (2018). Computer teachers hold march against state govt. Bhatinda : https://www.tribuneindia.com/.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 International Education and Research Journal (IERJ)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.