• S. Saraswathi Head, School of management Studies, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, State of Telangana


Smartphones, Usage, Students, Education


This paper focuses on trends in usage of Smartphone among students. A sample of 150 students is drawn from different levels of study residing in the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad, Telangana. The main objectives of this study are to explore the trends of Smartphone and usage among students; to determine the preferred smartphone operating system among students; to determine the brand preference; and how frequently students use smartphone. Results indicate that Majority of the students preferred Samsung and Apple followed by Blackberry, HTC and others. Most of the students have shown interest to spend amount between 5,000 and 15,000. Study revealed that, in the college, taking pictures, making a phone call, sending text message and studying are among the top purposes of usage. At home, participants use to download software, listening to music and taking video. Taking pictures has the least score. At other places, participants use smartphone for watching videos, listening to music, taking video and checking e-mails. Making phone calls has the least score. Majority of the students opined that smartphone is useful for education. More than 50 percent of the students use smartphone always. Many of the students owned smartphone with an android and windows operating system.


I. Alfawareh, H.M., and Jusoh, S. (2014). Smartphones usage among university students: Najran University case. International Journal of Academic Research, 6(2). 321-326. doi: 0.7813/2075-4124.2014/6-2/B.48.

II. Baker. (2012). On the use of cellphones and other electronic devices in the classroom: evidence from a survey of faculty and students. Retrieved from ERIC:

III. Beaver, T. (2010, September). “Hold The Phone!": Cellphone Use and Partner Reaction Among University Students. Retrieved from EBSCO host:

IV. Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., & Battaglia, R. D. (2015). Innovation and competition in the smartphone industry: Is there a dominant design? Telecommunications Policy, 39(3-4), 162-175. DOI: 10.1016/ j.telpol.2014.07.002.

V. Dean, J. (2010). Smartphone user survey: a glimpse into the mobile lives of college students. Retrieved from: /smartphone/smartphone-survey/ Information technology (IT) acceptance theory. Retrieved from:

VI. eCycle Best. (2012). Smartphones as Tools for Education: Getting Smart With Smartphones. Retrieved from eCycle Best:

VII. Epstein, J. (2013, October). Smartphone Applications in Clinical Practice. Retrieved from questia:

VIII. Gayle R. Jesse (2015), Smartphone and App Usage Among College Students: Using Smartphones Effectively for Social and Educational Needs, Proceedings of the EDSIG Conference (2015) n3424 Conference on Information Systems and Computing Education Wilmington, North Carolina USA, p.1.

IX. Jacob, S.M. and Isaac, B. (2008), “The mobile devices and its mobile learning usage analysis”, proceedings of the International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, Vol. 1, March, 19-21, pp. 782-87.

X. Jesse, G. (2013). Like, Tweet, Or Pin: College Students and Their Current Use Of Social Media. Issues in Information Systems, 14(1), 403-414.

XI. J.L. Kim and J. Altmann, (2013). Adapting Smartphones as Learning Technology in a Korean University. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 17(1), 5-16.

XII. K.B. Payne, H. Wharrad and K. Watts, K. (2012). Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 12, 1-11.

XIII. Liu, C.-J., & Liang, H.-Y. (2014). The deep impression of smartphone brand on the customers’ decision making. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 338-343. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013. 12.468.

XIV. Maguth, B.M. (2013). The educative potential of cell phones in the social studies. classroom. The Social Studies, 104(2). 87–91. doi: 10.1080/00377996.2012.655347.

XV. N.M. M. Mohtar, M. A. Hassan, M. S. Hassan and M. N. Osman, (2013), IOSR Journal Of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), The Importance of Smartphone’s Usage Among Malaysian Undergraduates, Volume 14, Issue 3, 12-118, 2013.

XVI. Norazah Mohd Suki, (2013) "Students’ dependence on smart phones: The influence of social needs, social influences and convenience", Campus-Wide Information Systems, Vol. 30 Issue: 2,pp. 124-134.

XVII. N. Park and H. Lee, (2012). Social Implications of Smartphone Use: Korean College Students', Smartphone Use and Psychological Well-Being. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 15(9), 491-497.

XVIII. Park, Y. and Chen, J.V. (2007), “Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone”, Industrial Management and Data System, Vol. 107 No. 9, pp. 1349-65.

XIX. Park, N., Kim, Y.-C., Shon, H. Y., & Shim, H. (2013). Factors influencing smartphone use and dependency in South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1763-1770. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.008.

XX. Peterson, L. and Low, B. (2011), “Student attitudes towards mobile library services for smartphone”, Journal of Library Hi Tech, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 412-23.

XXI. Post, H. (2011, May 25). 99.8% of college students have cellphones: Ball State STude. Retrieved March 15, 2014, from Huff Post:

XXII. Tulane, S. (2010). Perceptions of Texting: A Comparison of Female High School and College Students. Retrieved from Questia:

XXIII. Wang, J.-L., Wang, H.-Z., Gaskin, J., & Wang, L.-H. (2015). The role of stress and motivation in problematic smartphone use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 181-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.005

XXIV. W. Uys, A. Mia, G.J.Jansen, H.V, Schyff, M.A. Josias, M. Khusu, M. Gierdien, N.A. Luekes, S. Faltein, T. Gihwala, T. Theunissen, Y. Samsodie, (2012) Smartphone Application Usage Amongst Students at a South African University, IST-Africa 2012 Conference Proceedings, 1-11.

Additional Files



How to Cite

S. Saraswathi. (2017). SMARTPHONE USAGE AMONG STUDENTS. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 3(6). Retrieved from