ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY

Authors

  • Dr. Kanupriya Gupta Senior Research Fellow, Faculty of Dental Sciences, IMS, BHU, Varanasi (U.P.)

Keywords:

Bite marks, cheiloscopy, forensic odontology, limitations, photographs, radiographs, rugoscopy, tooth prints

Abstract

The concept of using dental evidence in forensic investigation has kindled so much
interest in the recent past that forensic odontology is even suggested as the single positive
identification method to solve certain forensic cases. In this process, the shortcomings
in forensic odontology though few are overlooked. These discrepancies associated
with various methods are to be weighed cautiously to make forensic odontology a more
accurate, reliable, and reproducible investigatory science. In this paper, we present our
understanding of the limitations in various methods employed in forensic odontology.

References

Kapali S, Townsend G, Richards L, Parish T. Palatal rugae paterns in Australian aborigines and caucasians. Aust Dent J 1997;42:129-33.

Thomas CJ, Kotze TW Jr. The palatal rugae patern in six Southern African human populations. J Dent Assoc South Africa 1983;38:547-53.

Alberta Kumar DA J Decay rates in a cold climate region: A review of cases involving advanced decomposition from the medical examiner’s office in Edmonton. Forensic Sci 1998;43:57-61

Utsuno H, Kanoh T, Tadokoro O, Inoue K. Preliminary study of post mortem identiÞcation using lip prints. Forensic Sci Int 2005;149:129-32.

Sivapathasundharam B, Prakash PA, Sivakumar G. Lip prints (cheiloscopy). Indian J Dent Res 2001;12:234-7.

Strom F. Investigation of bite marks. J Dent Res 1963;42:312-6.

Rothwell BR. Bite marks in forensic dentistry: A review of legal and scientiÞc issues. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:223-32.

Rawson RD, Brooks S. ClassiÞcation of human breast morphology important to bite mark investigation. Ann Forensic Med Pathol 1984;5:19-24.

Barbanel JC, Evans JH. Bite marks in skin-mechanical factors J Forensic Sci Soc 1974;14:235-8.

Manjunath K, Sriram G, Saraswathi TR, Sivapathasundharam B.Enamel rod end patterns: A preliminary study using acetate peel technique and automated biometrics J Forensic Odontol

;1:33-6.

SASholl, Moody GH. Evaluation of dental radiographic identiÞcation: An experimental study. Forensic Sci Int 2001;115:165-9.

Ebert JI. Discussion of the bitemark standard reference scale-ABFO No-2. J Forensic Sci 1988;33:301-4.

Additional Files

Published

15-05-2017

How to Cite

Dr. Kanupriya Gupta. (2017). ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF FORENSIC ODONTOLOGY. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 3(5). Retrieved from https://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/1032