COMPARISON OF BEHAVIOR OF CONVENTIONAL RC STRUCTURE WITH STAINLESS STEEL ENCASED CONCRETE COLUMN STRUCTURE

Authors

  • Bhavik Adajaniya M.Tech Student in Structural Engineering in Parul Institute of Technology, Waghodia, Gujarat, India.
  • Anilkumar Kannauzia Assistant Professor in Civil Engineering Department in Parul Institute of Technology, Waghodia, Gujarat, India..
  • Hemal Shah Assistant Professor in Applied Mechanics Department in Government Engineering Collage, Bharuch, Gujarat, India.

Keywords:

Composite structure, Composite column, Stainless steel, Response spectrum, Response of building

Abstract

In modern period of technology to get maximum advantages of structural member under earthquake is the priority. Composite structure is one option to get the job done. Composite construction is increasing rapidly so the proper dynamic design should be needed to reduce the damage during the earthquake. In this study to fulfil the adjective of reducing the damage of the structure the composite column is used. The column is steel filled/encased concrete type composite column. And the material for steel casing is stainless steel 304 grade is used in modelling. Linear static and linear response spectrum analysis is carried out to study the response of the structure under. In this study the response of the conventional RC structure is compared with the response of the composite structure in which the stainless steel encased concrete column structure. For this analysis the FEM based ETABS software is used and the effect of this composite member is observed.

References

Amit Varma, James Ricles; “Seismic behaviour and modelling of high-strength composite concrete-filled steel tube (CFT) beam–columns” journal of constructional steel research. October 2001

Dabaon M, El-Khoriby S, El-Boghdadi M, Hassanein M.; “Confinement effect of stiffened and unstiffened concrete-filled stainless steel tubular stub columns”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2009.

Ehab Ellobody, Ben Young; “Behaviour of normal and high strength concrete- filled compact steel tube circular stub columns”, journal of constructional steel research. November 2005.

Ehab Ellobody, Ben Young; “Design and behaviour of concrete-filled cold- formed stainless steel tube columns”, structural engineering. November 2005

Mahesh Suresh Kumawat, L.G.Kularkar; “Analysis And Design Of Multi-storey Building Using Composite Structure”, International Journal Of Structural And Civil Engineering Research. May 2014.

Hiroshi Kuramoto; “Behaviour of Columns in Composite CES Structural System”, composite construction in steel and concrete. 2008

Hu HT, Huang CH, Wu MH, Wu YM. Nonlinear analysis of axially loaded concrete-filled tube columns with confinement effect. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003.

Huang CS, Yeh YK, Hu HT, Tsai KC, Weng YT, Wang SH et al. “Axial load behavior of stiffened concrete-filled steel columns”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002

Additional Files

Published

15-05-2017

How to Cite

Bhavik Adajaniya, Anilkumar Kannauzia, & Hemal Shah. (2017). COMPARISON OF BEHAVIOR OF CONVENTIONAL RC STRUCTURE WITH STAINLESS STEEL ENCASED CONCRETE COLUMN STRUCTURE. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 3(5). Retrieved from http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/875