"SUSTAINABILITY OF ESG FUNDS TOWARDS AGENDA 2030": A LITERATURE REVIEW
Keywords:Sustainability, ESG Funds, Agenda 2030, Sustainable Development
In the pursuit of global sustainable development, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) funds have gained prominence as financial instruments aligned with the principles of the United Nations Agenda 2030. This literature review explores the sustainability of ESG funds with Agenda 2030, examining their role in addressing critical socio-environmental challenges. This study aims to comprehensively analyse existing research to differentiate the methodologies employed, outcomes observed, and overarching conclusions drawn regarding the effectiveness of ESG funds in advancing the Agenda 2030 goals.
A comprehensive examination of peer-reviewed articles, reports, and studies of diverse disciplines was undertaken. The outcomes of this analysis reveal the multifaceted impact of ESG funds on sustainable development. ESG funds have demonstrated the potential to direct capital towards enterprises that exhibit positive environmental practices, prioritize social equity, and uphold strong governance values. The review highlights the nuanced ways in which ESG criteria are integrated into investment decisions, influencing corporate behavior and promoting responsible business practices.
In conclusion, this literature review offers a holistic understanding of the synergetic relationship between ESG funds and Agenda 2030. It concludes that while ESG funds have shown promise in contributing to Agenda 2030 objectives, still challenges remain. Variations in ESG metrics, lack of standardized reporting, and concerns about 'greenwashing' necessitate a cautious approach. Further research and industry collaboration are essential to refine methodologies for assessing the tangible effects of ESG investments on sustainability outcomes. As the world strives to meet the ambitious targets of Agenda 2030, the role of ESG funds as catalysts for positive change warrants ongoing scrutiny and refinement. It emphasizes the potential of ESG investments to drive sustainable practices across industries while acknowledging the need for continual improvement in measurement techniques and reporting standards. The insights provided herein contribute to the broader dialogue surrounding the role of financial mechanisms in shaping a more sustainable future.
I. Aich, S., Thakur, A., Nanda, D., Tripathy, S., & Kim, H.-C. (2021). Factors Affecting ESG towards Impact on Investment: A Structural Approach. Sustainability, 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910868
II. Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2019). Prioritizing SDG targets: Assessing baselines, gaps, and interlinkages. Sustainability Science, 14(2), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0596-8
III. Andrey, E. (2023). ESG is an innovative tool to improve the efficiency and financial stability of financial organizations. Procedia Computer Science, 221, 705–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.08.041
IV. Bai, X., Han, J., Ma, Y., & Zhang, W. (2022). ESG performance, institutional investors’ preference and financing constraints: Empirical evidence from China. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S157–S168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.013
V. Bauer, R., Ruof, T., & Smeets, P. (2021). Get Real! Individuals Prefer More Sustainable Investments. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(8), 3976–4043. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhab037
VI. Beloskar, V. D., & Rao, S. V. D. N. (2022). Did ESG Save the Day? Evidence From India During the COVID-19 Crisis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-022-09369-5
VII. Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (Second edition). SAGE.
VIII. Chien, F. (2023). The role of corporate governance and environmental and social responsibilities on the achievement of sustainable development goals in Malaysian logistic companies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 1610–1630. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2090407
IX. Chipalkatti, N., Le, Q. V., & Rishi, M. (2021). Sustainability and Society: Do Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors Matter for Foreign Direct Investment? Energies, 14(19), 6039. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196039
X. Comerio, N., & Strozzi, F. (2019). Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools. Tourism Economics, 25(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618793762
XI. Dabić, M., Maley, J., Dana, L.-P., Novak, I., Pellegrini, M. M., & Caputo, A. (2020). Pathways of SME internationalization: A bibliometric and systematic review. Small Business Economics, 55(3), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00181-6
XII. Dantas, T. E. T., de-Souza, E. D., Destro, I. R., Hammes, G., Rodriguez, C. M. T., & Soares, S. R. (2021). How the combination of Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.005
XIII. Efthymiou, L., Kulshrestha, A., & Kulshrestha, S. (2023). A Study on Sustainability and ESG in the Service Sector in India: Benefits, Challenges, and Future Implications. Administrative Sciences, 13(7), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13070165
XIV. Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernández-Izquierdo, M., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Rivera-Lirio, J., & Muñoz-Torres, M. (2019). Rating the Raters: Evaluating how ESG Rating Agencies Integrate Sustainability Principles. Sustainability, 11(3), 915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030915
XV. Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimized digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
XVI. Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K., Bakker, P., Berkhout, F., De Boer, Y., Rockström, J., Ludwig, K., & Kok, M. (2015). Beyond Cockpit-ism: Four Insights to Enhance the Transformative Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 7(2), 1651–1660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021651
XVII. Iazzolino, G., Bruni, M. E., Veltri, S., Morea, D., & Baldissarro, G. (n.d.). The impact of ESG factors on financial efficiency: An empirical analysis for the selection of sustainable firm portfolios. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2463
XVIII. Irigaray, H. A. R., & Stocker, F. (2022). ESG: New concept for old problems. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 20(4), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395186096x
XIX. Jeris, S. S., Ur Rahman Chowdhury, A. S. M. N., Akter, Mst. T., Frances, S., & Roy, M. H. (2022). Cryptocurrency and stock market: Bibliometric and content analysis. Heliyon, 8(9), e10514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10514
XX. Khanra, S., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., & Mäntymäki, M. (2021). Bibliometric analysis and literature review of ecotourism: Toward sustainable development. Tourism Management Perspectives, 37, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100777
XXI. Landier, A., & Lovo, S. (2020). ESG Investing: How to Optimize Impact? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3508938
XXII. Lioui, A. (2018). ESG Factor Investing: Myth or Reality ? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3272090
XXIII. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2535–b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
XXIV. Ng, A. (2021). Green Investing and Financial Services: ESG Investing for a Sustainable World. In The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability (pp. 1–12). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_104-1
XXV. Parikh, A., Kumari, D., Johann, M., & Mladenović, D. (2023). The impact of environmental, social and governance score on shareholder wealth: A new dimension in investment philosophy. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 8, 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100101
XXVI. Rashed, A. H., & Shah, A. (2021). The role of the private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(3), 2931–2948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00718-w
XXVII. Rosato, P. F., Caputo, A., Valente, D., & Pizzi, S. (2021). 2030 Agenda and sustainable business models in tourism: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Indicators, 121, 106978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106978
XXVIII. Sadhukhan, J., Dugmore, T. I. J., Matharu, A., Martinez-Hernandez, E., Aburto, J., Rahman, P. K. S. M., & Lynch, J. (2020). Perspectives on “Game Changer” Global Challenges for Sustainable 21st Century: Plant-Based Diet, Unavoidable Food Waste Biorefining, and Circular Economy. Sustainability, 12(5), 1976. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051976
XXIX. Steblianskaia, E., Vasiev, M., Denisov, A., Bocharnikov, V., Steblyanskaya, A., & Wang, Q. (2023). Environmental-social-governance concept bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review: Are investors becoming more environmentally conscious? Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 17, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100218
XXX. Tchounwou, P. (2004). Environmental Research and Public Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 1(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph2004010001
XXXI. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (n.d.). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.
XXXII. Woldesellasse, H., & Tesfamariam, S. (2023). Risk analysis of onshore oil and gas pipelines: Literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience, 2(4), 100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iintel.2023.100052
XXXIII. Zhu, X. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financing Constraints: Empirical Evidence from China’s Listed Corporates: 2014 International Conference on Education Technology and Social Science, Taiyuan, China. https://doi.org/10.2991/icetss-14.2014.14
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 International Education and Research Journal (IERJ)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.