TEACHER TRAINING AND WRITING INSTRUCTION: A STUDY OF THIRD- TO FIFTH-GRADE EDUCATORS’ CONFIDENCE
Keywords:
Writing, Teachers, Self-Efficacy, Professional Development, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, QualitativeAbstract
Third- to fifth-grade teachers are struggling to teach writing, and research has not addressed how their training to teach writing or their confidence in their ability to use effective strategies to teach writing influences their teaching. The purpose of this basic qualitative study was to explore third- to fifth-grade teachers’ training in writing instruction and their confidence in their ability to use effective strategies to teach writing. The conceptual framework was based on Bandura’s theory of self-efficacy and Shulman’s theory of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Participants included nine third- to fifth-grade teachers who had experience teaching writing. Data were collected through semistructured interviews. A priori and open coding were used as the first steps in data analysis. Next, axial coding was used to identify categories and themes. Findings indicated that participants used their pedagogical content knowledge to differentiate their teaching strategies in teaching writing. Findings also indicated that the longer a teacher taught, the more confident they felt in teaching writing. Finally, the findings indicated that the teachers believed that they did not receive writing pedagogy training in their teacher preparation programs, received only modest professional development once in the classroom, and desired more training to teach writing. The results provided insights into how training and confidence play a role in developing effective teaching practices. Results could be used by administrators and professional development coordinators to better support teachers in teaching the process of writing.
References
I. Sanders, J., Ikpeze, C. H., Tracy, K. N., Smetana, L., Myers, J., Scales, R. Q., Yoder, K. K., & Grisham, D. L. (2020). A curriculum model for K-12 writing teacher education. Research in the Teaching of English, 54(4), 392 417. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202030739
II. Brinkmann, J. L. (2019). Making a difference: Increasing elementary preservice teacher self-efficacy in mathematics. Educational Planning, 26(1), 7–21. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1212529.pdf
III. Hodges, T. S., Wright, K. L., & McTigue, E. (2019). What do middle grades preservice teachers believe about writing and writing instruction?. RMLE Online, 42(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2019.1565508
IV. Raymond-West, T., & Rangel, V. S. (2020). Teacher preparation and novice teachers’ self-efficacy in literacy instruction. Education and Urban Society, 52(4), 534–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124519879425
V. von Hippel, P. T., & Bellows, L. (2018). How much does teacher quality vary across teacher preparation programs? Reanalyses from six states. Economics of Education Review, 64, 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.01.005
VI. Cho, S. J., Doyle, K., & Rittenhouse-Cea, H. (2019). Infusing evidence-based practices in pre-service preparation program for teachers of culturally and linguistically diverse students. Journal of Multilingual Education Research, 8, 37–59. https://research.library.fordham.edu/jmer/vol8/iss1/6/
VII. Ciampa, K., & Gallagher, T. L. (2018). A comparative examination of Canadian and American pre-service teacher self-efficacy beliefs for literacy instruction. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 457–481. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9793-6
VIII. Kohnen, A. M. (2019). Becoming a teacher of writing: An analysis of the identity resources offered to preservice teachers across contexts. English Education, 51(4), 348–375. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee201930190
IX. Boche, B., Bartels, S., & Wassilak, D. (2021). Reimagining an elementary teacher education preparation program: Striving for integrated teaching. Educational Considerations, 47(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.2254
X. Brenner, D., & McQuirk, A. (2019). A snapshot of writing in elementary teacher preparation programs. The New Educator, 15(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2018.1427291
XI. Svendsen, B. (2020). Inquiries into teacher professional development—What matters?. Education, 140(3), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.93
XII. Kwok, M. (2022). Tensions between disciplinarity and generality within a professional development on writing instruction. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 21(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-06-2021-0059
XIII. Shi, L., & Chen, H. (2020). Changes to teachers’ knowledge base: Do they make a difference to students’ writing outcomes? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 4-28. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.18025.shi
XIV. Philippakos, Z. A. (2020). A yearlong, professional development model on genre-based strategy instruction on writing. Journal of Educational Research, 113(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1767531
XV. Nesmith, S. M., & Cooper, S. (2020). Elementary STEM learning. In Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 101–114). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7971/CGP/v28i02/73-85
XVI. Hennessy, J., Marlow, N., Alexander, J., & Dymoke, S. (2021). Professional contraction and the growth of teacher confidence. Experiences in the teaching of poetry from the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Oxford Review of Education, 47(3), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1835627
XVII. Clark, S. K., & Andreasen, L. (2021). Exploring elementary teacher self-efficacy and teacher beliefs: Are we preparing teachers to teach culturally diverse students? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(1), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2020.1777528
XVIII. Bifuh-Ambe, E. (2020). Examining elementary teacher feelings of self-efficacy as writers: Do the writing samples tell more compelling stories? Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 9(2), 1–25. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/wte/vol9/iss2/10
XIX. Khalid, F., & Husnin, H. (2019). Challenges and support for the development of novice teachers’ professional identities. International Association for Development of the Information Society, 195–199. https://doi.org/10.33965/icedutech2019_201902c008
XX. Regier, B. J. (2021). Examining relationships among concert band directors’ efficacious sources, self-efficacy for teaching strategies, and effective teaching skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(4), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420943137
XXI. Barton, E. A., & Dexter, S. (2020). Sources of teachers’ self-efficacy for technology integration from formal, informal, and independent professional learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09671-6
XXII. Wyatt, M., & Dikilitaş, K. (2021). English language teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for grammar instruction: Implications for teacher educators. Language Learning Journal, 49(5), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1642943
XXIII. Culham, R. (2003). 6+ 1 traits of writing: The complete guide grades 3 and up. Scholastic Inc.
XXIV. Ramlal, A., & Augustin, D. S. (2020). Engaging students in reflective writing: an action research project. Educational Action Research, 28(3), 518–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.1595079
XXV. Maynard, C., & Young, C. (2022). The results of using a traits-based rubric on the writing performance of third grade students. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 9(2), 102–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.660
XXVI. Wu, W. C. V., Yang, J. C., Scott Chen Hsieh, J., & Yamamoto, T. (2020). Free from demotivation in EFL writing: The use of online flipped writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1567556
XXVII. Coe, M., Hanita, M., Nishioka, V., & Smiley, R. (2011). An investigation of the impact of the 6+ 1 trait writing model on grade 5 student writing achievement. Final report. NCEE 2012-4010. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED527445.pdf
XXVIII. AVID. (2018) http://www. AVID.org
XXIX. Plano Clark, V., Stringfield, S., Dariotis, J., & Clark, R., (2017). Challenges with I implementing the Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) reform model: A case study in Ohio. International Journal of Educational Reform, 26(3), 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791702600304
XXX. Bernhardt, P. E. (2013). The advancement via individual determination (AVID) program: Providing cultural capital and college access to low-income students. School Community Journal, 23(1), 203-222. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1004339
XXXI. Pugh, P. M., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2016). Influence of a school district’s advancement via individual determination (AVID) program on self-efficacy and other indicators of student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 100(3), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636516679261
XXXII. Langer, Judith A., et al. (2000). Guidelines for teaching middle and high school students to read and write well: Six features of effective instruction. Albany, NY: National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement.
XXXIII. Auman, M. (2008) Step Up to Writing. 3rd edition. Boston: Sopris West Educational Services.
XXXIV. Cihak, D. F., & Castle, K. (2011). Improving expository writing skills with explicit and strategy instructional methods in inclusive middle school classrooms. International Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361261
XXXV. McCarthey, S. J., & Mkhize, D. (2013). Teachers’ orientations towards writing. Journal of Writing Research, 5(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.05.01.1
XXXVI. Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200201
XXXVII. Kahlke, R. (2014). Generic qualitative approaches: Pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300119
XXXVIII. Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255–256. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/5805
XXXIX. Merriam, S. A, & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Basic qualitative research. In Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed, pp. 23-25). John Wiley & Sons.
XL. Percy, W. H., Kostere, K., & Kostere, S. (2015). Generic qualitative research in psychology. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 76–85. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2097&context=tqr
XLI. Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
XLII. Gray, L. M., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G. R., & Cook, K. (2020). Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: Zoom video communications. The Qualitative Report, 25(5), 1292–1301. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol25/iss5/9
XLIII. Mirick, R. G., & Wladkowski, S. P. (2019). Skype in qualitative interviews: Participant and researcher perspectives. The Qualitative Report, 24(12), 3061–3072. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3632
XLIV. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. 3rd Edition. Sage Publications.
XLV. Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1–26. https://doi:10.1177/160940690400300104
XLVI. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Sage Journals, 18(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
XLVII. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. SUNY Press.
XLVIII. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
XLIX. Peel, K. L. (2020). A beginner's guide to applied educational research using thematic analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 25(1), 1–16. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol25/iss1/2
L. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
LI. Deane, P. (2018). The challenges of writing in school: conceptualizing writing development within a sociocognitive framework. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844
LII. Shi, L., & Baker, A. (2022). Innovations in teaching L2 writing: How changes in teacher SCK and PCK impact learners’ perceptions and writing outcomes. System, 106, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102788
LIII. Schrodt, K. E., Elleman, A. M., FitzPatrick, E. R., Hasty, M. M., Kim, J. K., Tharp, T. J., & Rector, H. (2019). An examination of mindset instruction, self-regulation, and writer’s workshop on kindergarteners’ writing performance and motivation: A mixed-methods study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(5), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1577778
LIV. Reid, S. F., & Moses, L. (2020). Students become comic book author-illustrators: Composing with words and images in a fourth-grade comics writers’ workshop. The Reading Teacher, 73(4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1864
LV. McCarthey, S. J., & Woodard, R. (2018). Faithfully following, adapting, or rejecting mandated curriculum: teachers’ curricular enactments in elementary writing instruction. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 13(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2017.1376672
LVI. Miller, L. C., Russell, C. L., Cheng, A.-L., & Zembles, S. (2018). Testing the efficacy of a scaffolded writing intervention with online degree-completion nursing students: A quasi-experimental design. Nurse Education in Practice, 32, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.06.011
LVII. Paulick, J. H., Myers, J., Quinn, A., Couch, L., Dunkerly-Bean, J., Robbins, H. H., & Ward-Parsons, A. (2019). A window into practice: Examining elementary writing methods instruction. Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 6(1), 57-75. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/teachinglearning_fac_pubs/188/
LVIII. Boche, B., Bartels, S., & Wassilak, D. (2021). Reimagining an elementary teacher education preparation program: Striving for integrated teaching. Educational Considerations, 47(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.2254
LIX. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004
LX. Khan, R., Grijalva, R., & Enriquez-Gates, A. (2019). Teachers as change agents: promoting meaningful professional development using action research to support international educational reform. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 5(2), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.32865/fire201952167
LXI. Evens, M., Elen, J., Larmuseau, C., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Promoting the development of teacher professional knowledge: Integrating content and pedagogy in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.001
LXII. Saglam-Arslan, A., Karatas, F. O., Unal, S., & Aslan, A. (2022). The effects of group mentoring on teachers’ classroom activities: An instrumental case study. Participatory Educational Research, 9(5), 390–413. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.120.9.5
LXIII. Mosley, K. C., Playfair, E. C., Weppner, C. H., Balat, A., & McCarthy, C. J. (2022). ‘The bread and butter of a difficult profession’: Mentoring as a resource for teacher stress. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. https://doi:10.1080/13540602.2022.2144819
LXIV. Graham, S. (2021). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125
LXV. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191
LXVI. Hennessy, J., Marlow, N., Alexander, J., & Dymoke, S. (2021). Professional contraction and the growth of teacher confidence. Experiences in the teaching of poetry from the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Oxford Review of Education, 47(3), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1835627
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Education and Research Journal (IERJ)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
