IS INDIA ABLE TO PRODUCE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES WITH THE LIMITED REOSURCES AVAILABLE?

Authors

  • Akanksha Baruah P.G. MA Political Science, University of Delhi

Keywords:

Indian International Relations Theories (IRT), Policy-Oriented Research, Homegrown Theorizing, Resources

Abstract

Resource diversion has impacted the production of Indian International Relations Theories (IRT) massively and has led to basically absence of Indian IRTs. Even with the extremely limited resources available and the field of theory building being marginalized, work has been in progress for the production of Indian IRTs by the academia. The limited resources are being diverted towards policy-oriented research, leaving the theory building academia surviving on whatever they are receiving. Most of the theories in IR are western centric, which do not fit well in the Indian context. Hence, there is a need to facilitate the production of Indian IRTs, so that Indian issues can be solved in a much better way and India’s standing in the international arena is enhanced significantly. As for methodology, qualitative secondary data sources are used for the study. Homegrown theorization is used to categorize the Indian IRTs discussed in the study. Multiple academic writings have been observed and analyzed and conclusions have been drawn.

References

I. Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry. (2007). “Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction”. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Volume 7, pp 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcx006

II. Alejandro, Audrey. (2017). “International Relations and Foreign Policy in India: Policy-Oriented Works between Discipline and State”. In Mischa Hansel, Raphaëlle Khan and Mélissa Levaillant (Eds.), Theorizing Indian Foreign Policy (pp 29-46). New York: Routledge.

III. Aydinli, Ersel and Biltekin, Gonca. (2018). Widening the World of International Relations: Homegrown Theorizing. New York: Routledge.

IV. Bajpai, Kanti. (2003). “Indian Conceptions of Order and Justice: Nehruvian, Gandhian, Hindutva and Neo-Liberal”. In Rosemary Foot, John Gaddis and Andrew Hurrell (Eds.), Order and Justice in International Relations (pp 236-261). New York: Oxford University Press.

V. Bajpai, Kanti. (2005). “International studies in India: Bringing theory (back) home”. In K. Bajpai and S. Mallavarapu (Eds.), International Relations in India: Bringing Theory Back Home (pp 17–38). New Delhi: Orient Longman.

VI. Bajpai, Kanti. (2009). “Obstacles to good work in Indian international relation”. International Studies, Volume 46 (1-2), pp 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600208

VII. Behera, Navnita Chadha. (2007). “Re-imagining IR in India”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Volume 7, pp 341-368. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm014

VIII. Boesche, Roger. (2002). The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and His Arthashastra. Maryland: Lexington Books.

IX. Boesche, Roger. (2003). “Kautilya’s Arthashastra on war and Diplomacy in Ancient India”. The Journal of Military History, Volume 67, pp 9-37. https://doi.org/10.1353/jmh.2003.0006

X. Mallavarapu, Siddarth. (2005). “Introduction”. In S. Mallavarapu and K. Bajpai (Eds.), International Relations in India: Bringing Theory Back Home (pp 1-16). New Delhi: Orient Longman.

XI. Mohan, Raja C. (2009). “The re-making of Indian foreign policy: Ending the marginalization of international relations community”. International Studies, Volume 46 (1-2), pp 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600210

XII. Shahi, Deepshikha. (Eds.). (2020). Sufism - A Theoretical Intervention in Global International Relations. Maryland: Rowan and Littlefield.

XIII. Shahi, Deepshikha and Ascione, Gennaro. (2016). “Rethinking the absence of post-Western International Relations theory in India: ‘Advaitic monism’ as an alternative epistemological resource”. European Journal of International Relations, Volume 22 (2), pp 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115592938

XIV. Shani, Giorgio and Behera, Navnita. (2021). “Provincializing International Relations through a reading of dharma”. Review of International Studies, Volume 48(5), pp 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021052100053X

XV. Sharma, Devika. (2009). “Mapping international relations teaching and research in Indian universities”. International Studies, Volume 46 (1), pp 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600206

XVI. Subrahmanyam, Krishnaswamy. (2005). “The birth of IDSA and the early years”. In Selected Articles from IDSA Journals, Vol. 1, Strategic Thought: The Formative Years, edited by N.S. Sisodia and Sujit Dutta. New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses.

XVII. Zaman, Rashed Uz. (2006). “Kautilya: The Indian Strategic Thinker and Indian Strategic Culture”. Comparative Strategy, Volume 25(3), pp 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495930600956260

Additional Files

Published

15-09-2023

How to Cite

Akanksha Baruah. (2023). IS INDIA ABLE TO PRODUCE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES WITH THE LIMITED REOSURCES AVAILABLE?. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 9(9). Retrieved from http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/3064