INTERACTION OF MICROPOLITICS AND EDUCATION QUALITY: COMMENTARY ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND CURRICULUM

Authors

  • Pradeep Ramavath Jayanaik PhD Student, Development Studies, Institute for Social and Economic Change(ISEC), Nagarabhavi, Bengaluru-560072

Keywords:

Micropolitics, Education Quality, Infrastructure, Curriculum

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to uncover the interactional patterns between ‘micropolitics’ and selected factors of ‘education quality’ in two rural settings of Karnataka. These interactionalpatterns obtained are used to analyse existing policies relating to ‘quality frameworks’ for rural schools as envisaged in The Right to Education Act of 2009 through mission mode program of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. This ethnographical explorationuses the micropolitical perspective on schools as descriptive and analytical lens to understand the manifestation on quality parameters. It examines the current strategies of improving school quality through better infrastructure facilities, curricular materials, and analysis of concomitant micropolitical behaviours.

Field immersion to the selected villages, educational institutions, and district and sub-district level units helped the process of triangulation and insights to get concretised. Though the findings from the study are not fit for generalisation, they raise important questions relating to visualisation of education quality at the Meta-Policy level and associated interpretation of larger vision of quality at the implementation sites. For understanding, micropolitical designs at school and sub-district levels empirical works of Kelchtermans, G(2007), Iannaccone L (1975) and Blasé (1991) have been contextually used to explore the interactional patters. Descriptive reasoning forresultant quality expressions have been provided though interactive frame of quality and micropolitics.

Data, information, and evidences were subjected to variety of ‘theoretical immersions’ to explain how macro level programs of educational quality gets caught up in the ‘black box’ of micropolitics. Thus demonstrating the resultant interpretation, derivation of meanings having latent impact on implementation as well as outcomes related to quality improvement processes. Narratives, case studies, and limited statistical evidences were used to examine educational quality processes, outcomes at the micro- social contexts.

References

Altbach, P & Jyaram N (2010). Can India Garner the demographic dividend ?. News Paper article in ‘The Hindu’ dated 10-12-2010.

Ambedkar.B.R. (1946). States and Minorities. Baba Saheb Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Writings and Speeches. Vol-I. Government of India . New Delhi.

Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) (Rural) 2009, 2010,2011 Mumbai, Pratham Resource Centre.

Banerjee, A.; Cole, S.; Duflo, E.; Linden, L. 2003. Remedying Education: Evidence from Two Randomized Experiments in India. Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Poverty Action Lab Paper No. 4, September).

Banerjee, A.; Kremer, M.; with Lanjouw, J.; Lanjouw, P. 2002. Teacher-Student Ratios and School Performance in Udaipur, India: A Prospective Evaluation. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University. (Mimeograph)

Bishop, J. 1989. Is the test score decline responsible for the productivity growth decline? American Economic Review Vol. 79, No. 1: 178–97.

Blasé J (1991). The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict and cooperation. Newbury Park,CA.Corwin.

Bourdieu, Pierre and Passeron, Jean-Claude(1977). Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. London: Sage.

--------------------. 1977. “Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction”. In Power and Ideology in Education, Karabel and Jalsey (eds.), OUP, 487-511.

Chavan M in ASER 2010, Mumbai , Pratham Resource Centre.

Cheema S and Rondinelli D (eds,2007), Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2007, 326 pp

Coleman J.S. ( 1965). Education and political development. Princeton University Press. New Jersey.

Dewey J (1916). Democracy and Education. An introduction to the philosophy of education.

Dhankar R (2010) Ed. Contemporary education dialogue. Vol 7:1 , January 2010.

Friedrich C.J. (1966) “Federalism and opposition”, Government and Opposition Vol.1.

Gandhi M.K (1915). Towards a new Education. Navjivan Trust. Ahmedabad.

Goyal, Sangita(2007). Learning Achievements in India: A Study of Primary Education in Rajasthan. Human Development Unit. South Asia Region. World Bank

Heneveld, W. and H. Craig (1996). ‘Schools Count. World Bank Project Designs and the Quality of Primary Education in Sub- Saharan Africa’, World Bank Technical Paper No. 303, Africa Technical Department Series, World Bank, Washington D.C.

Hoyle, E (1986). The politics of school management. London: Hodder and Stoughton

Iannaccone, I ( 1975).Education policy systems: A study guide for educational administrators. Fort Lauderdale, FL:Nova University.

Iannaccone, L (1975).Education policy systems: A study guide for educational administrators. Fort Lauderdale, FL:Nova University.

Innaccone I (1991). Micropolitics of education: What and why. Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 465-471.

Innaccone L & Lutz FW (1970). Politics, Power and Policy: The Governing of Local School Districts (Columbus, Ohio: Charles E.Merrill Publishing Co)

Innaccone L (1991). Micropolitics of education: What and why. Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 465-471.

Jha N &Mathur P( 1999). Decentralization and Local Politics. Sage Publications. New Delhi

Kabir Vajapayi (2006). BALA. Vinyas. Ahmedabad.

Kelchtermans G (2007). Macropolitics caught in micropolitics: the case of the policy on quality control in Flanders (Belgium). Journal of Education Policy. Vol.22, No.4, July 2007, pp. 471-491

Kumar & Sarangapani (2004 ). History of Quality debate. UNESCO.

Kumar V.A (2006). Popular Participation in Primary Education in Rural Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Karnataka Studies, Vol.3, No 2 & Vol.4, No 1, May 2006- April 2007, 71-85.

Kumar, Krishna (2000). Quality in Education: Competing Concepts. Contemporary Education Dialogue, Vol. 7(1), pp. 7-18.

Kumar, Krishna (2010). Quality in Education: Competing Concepts. Contemporary education dialogue. Vol 7 No 1. January 2010.

Lee, J.; Barro, R. J. 2001. Schooling Quality in a Cross-Section of Countries. Economica, Vol. 38, No. 272, November: 465–88.

Lipsky M (1969). Towards a theory of street level bureaucracy. The University of Wisconsin.

Michael Ward (2006). Rural Education. DFID. Accessed on 12-04-2015 on http://www.iitk.ac.in/3inetwork/html/reports/IIR2007/12-Rural%20Education.pdf

Narain, Pande & Sharma (1976). Panchayati Raj and Educational Administration. Aalekh Publishers. Jaipur.

NCERT(2006). Modules on Quality Dimensiosn in School Education under SSA. New Delhi.

National Curriculum Framework (2005). Position Papers(all) . NCERT. New Delhi.

Rudolph & Rudolph (1972). Eds. Education of Politics in India. Oxford University Press. Bombay.

SIO (2014) . Education in Assembly. Bangalore.

Verspoor, A. (2003), ‘The Challenge of Learning: Improving the quality of Basic Education’, ADEA Journal, Vol 5, No. 4, ADEA, Paris.

Winch, Christopher (2010). The Dialectic of Inputs and Outputs. Contemporary Education Dialogue, Vol. 7(1), pp. 7-18.

Additional Files

Published

15-05-2016

How to Cite

Pradeep Ramavath Jayanaik. (2016). INTERACTION OF MICROPOLITICS AND EDUCATION QUALITY: COMMENTARY ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND CURRICULUM. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 2(5). Retrieved from http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/268