• Cynthia B. Bauman 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431
  • Liliana Rodríguez-Campos 4202 E. Fowler Avenue Tampa, FL 33620, USA


Collaborative Evaluation, School Improvement, Social Network Analysis, Teacher Leadership


The novelty of the Model for Collaborative Evaluations or MCE (Rodríguez-Campos & Rincones– Gómez, 2013) resides in the way in which each of its elements (components and subcomponents) influences the others and, as a consequence, the overall collaborative evaluation. To accomplish a comprehensive collaborative evaluation, the interactive use of the MCE elements on a rotating and remixing basis is recommended. However, there is a benefit of utilizing the individual MCE component Identify the Situation, and specifically the subcomponent Identify Stakeholders. Social Network Analysis (SNA) was used in the featured case study (Bauman, 2018) to create visual representations of teacher professional networks that operate within a school. Prominent members of this network were identified as teacher leaders. Teachers who are identified as teacher leaders by their peers, and engage in collaborative practices, are able to provide a unique perspective about school operation practices and implementation of processes for school improvement planning.


I. Affolter, T. L., & Hoffman, D. A. (2011). Flip the script: What happens when teachers and administrators lead together for social justice. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 5(4), 360-370. Retrieved from

II. Baker-Doyle, K. (2015). Stories in networks and networks in stories: A tri-modal model for mixed-methods social network research on teachers. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 72-82. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.911838

III. Bastian M., Heymann S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media . Retrieved from

IV. Bauman, C.B. (2018). Exploring the 'spaces between': Teachers' perceptions of teacher leadership within professional networks. (Publication No. 10980016 ) [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida]. Pro-Quest Dissertations Publishing.

V. Beachum, F., & Dentith, A. M. (2004). Teacher leaders creating cultures of school renewal and transformation. Educational Forum, 68(3), 276-286. doi:10.1080/00131720408984639

VI. Brosky, D. (2011). Micropolitics in the school: Teacher leaders' use of political skill and influence tactics. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(1). Retrieved from

VII. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.

VIII. Bush, T. & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: what do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553-571, doi:10.1080/13632434.2014.928680

IX. Cosenza, M. N. (2015). Defining teacher leadership: Affirming the teacher leader model standards. Issues in Teacher Education, 24(2), 79-99. Retrieved from

X. Cuiccio, C. & Husby-Slater, M. (2018). Needs Assessment Guidebook: Supporting the Development of District and School Needs Assessments. American Institutes for Research.

XI. Daly, A. J., Moolenaar, N. M., Bolivar, J. M., & Burke, P. (2010). Relationships in reform: The role of teachers' social networks. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(3), 359-391. doi:10.1108/09578231011041062

XII. Donaldson, G. (2001). Cultivating leadership in schools: Connecting people, purpose, and practice. Teachers College Press.

XIII. Donaldson, G. (2007). What do teachers bring to leadership? Educational Leadership, 65(1), 26-29. Retrieved from

XIV. Donohoo, J. (2018). Collective teacher efficacy research: Productive patterns of behaviour and other positive consequences. Journal of Educational Change, 19(3), 323-345. doi:10.1007/s10833-018-9319-2

XV. DuFour, R., & Fullan, M. (2013). Cultures built to last: Systemic PLCs at work. Solution Tree Press.

XVI. Fairman, J. C., & Mackenzie, S. V. (2012). How teacher leaders influence others and understand their leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(1), 61-87. doi:10.1080/13603124.2014.904002

XVII. Faust, K., & Wasserman, S. (1992). Centrality and prestige: A review and synthesis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 4(1), 23-78.

XVIII. Fetterman, D., Rodríguez-Campos, L. & Zukowski, A. (2018). Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation: Stakeholder involvement approaches. Guilford Publications, Inc.

XIX. Frost, D. (2012). From professional development to system change: Teacher leadership and innovation. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 205-227. doi:10.1080/19415257.2012.657861

XX. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

XXI. Helterbran, V. R. (2010). Teacher leadership: Overcoming 'I am just a teacher' syndrome. Education, 131(2), 363-371. Retrieved from

XXII. Hovardas, T. (2016). Primary school teachers and outdoor education: Varying levels of teacher leadership in informal networks of peers. Journal of Environmental Education, 47(3), 237-254. doi:10.1080/00958964.2015.1113155

XXIII. Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687

XXIV. Hunzicker, J. (2012). Professional development and job-embedded collaboration: How teachers learn to exercise leadership. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 267-289. doi:10.1080/19415257.2012.657870

XXV. Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (3rd ed.). Corwin.

XXVI. Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 251-262.

XXVII. Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2007). Teacher leadership in (in)action. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), 111-134. doi:10.1177/1741143207071387

XXVIII. Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Corwin.

XXIX. Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (n.d.) School Improvement: Needs Assessment. United States Department of Education.

XXX. Rodríguez-Campos, L. (2012). Advances in collaborative evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(4), 523-528,

XXXI. Rodríguez-Campos, L. & Rincones-Gómez, R. (2013). Collaborative evaluations: Step by step. (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press.

XXXII. Smylie, M. A., Conley, S., & Marks, H. M. (2011). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. In E. B. Hilty (Ed.), Teacher leadership: The “new” foundations of teacher education-A reader (Counterpoints) (pp. 265-282). Peter Lang.

XXXIII. Szczesiul, S. A., & Huizenga, J. L. (2015). Bridging structure and agency: Exploring the role of teacher leadership in teacher collaboration. Journal of School Leadership, 25(2), 368.

XXXIV. Taylor, M., Goeke, J., Klein, E., Onore, C., & Geist, K. (2011). Changing leadership: Teachers lead the way for schools that learn. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 920-929. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.03.003

XXXV. Timperley, H. S. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 395-420. doi:10.1080/00220270500038545

XXXVI. Timperley, H.S., Ell, F., LeFevre, D. (2018). Developing adaptive expertise through professional learning communities. In A. Harris, M. Jones, and J. B. Huffman (Eds.), Teachers leading educational reform (pp. 175-189). Routledge.

XXXVII. Vernon-Dotson, L., & Floyd, L. O. (2012). Building leadership capacity via school partnerships and teacher teams. Clearing House, 85(1), 38-49. doi:10.1080/00098655.2011.607477

XXXVIII. Woodland, R. H., Barry, S., & Roohr, K. C. (2014). Using social network analysis to promote schoolwide instructional innovation: A case study. Journal of School Leadership, 24(1), 114-145.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Cynthia B. Bauman, & Liliana Rodríguez-Campos. (2022). COLLABORATIVE EVALUATION AND SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT: AMPLIFYING THE POWER OF TEACHER PROFESSIONAL NETWORKS. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 8(11). Retrieved from