• Michael E. Mitchell University of South Florida
  • Michelle Rincones-Rodríguez University of Florida


Model for Collaborative Evaluations, Psychotherapy


The Model for Collaborative Evaluations (MCE) was part of the initial efforts to examine whether personal characteristics are associated with a multi-pillar, base 22-numbered scale. The MCE capitalizes on the strengths of various key stakeholders who provide a baseline for formative and summative decision-making. The evaluation used a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews to collect data from community members. Psychotherapy Base 22 offers a compass in the search for the path that leads to psychological balance. It provides several advantages like gaining specific insight for psychologists to use as a tool to provide individualized therapy. Humans are not defined by a single number, but by an interrelation of all the pillars in the construct. In Psychotherapy Base 22, there are no good or bad, positive, or negative numbers, just harmony or disharmony with numbers, which may lead to trends that guide us in the search for personal balance. Implications of this collaborative evaluation results are highlighted, including specific stakeholders’ perceptions, along with ways of using Psychotherapy Base 22 with other stakeholders. The evaluation approach has two conceptually related segments, a formative part of the evaluation and a summative portion.  The formative part of the evaluation provided immediate feedback to the evaluand who then provided brain based reasons for the early results, which catalyzed thoughts of analysis refinement. The summative evaluation provided an ending that could be further used as the basis for post-project work. The MCE has six components that guided the evaluation in an efficient and effective manner. These components are applied in a recursive and iterative manner.


I. Fetterman, David, Liliana Rodríguez-Campos, and Anne Zukowski. 2018. Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation: Stakeholder Involvement Approaches. New York: Guilford Publications.

II. Fetterman, David, Liliana Rodríguez-Campos, Abraham Wandersman, and Rita O’Sullivan. 2014. “Collaborative, Participatory and Empowerment Evaluation: Building a Strong Conceptual Foundation for Stakeholder Involvement Approaches to Evaluation.” American Journal of Evaluation 35 (1): 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013509875.

III. López-Cano, M. 2020. Numerological Psychotherapy in Base 22 [La Psicoterapia Numerológica in Base 22]. Madrid, Spain: Aunar Terapias.

a. Mitchell, M., Rincones-Rodríguez, M., & Walker-Egea, C. (2021, November). Numerology in

i. base 22 and personal characteristics . Paper presented at the 35th annual conference of the American Evaluation Association (AEA). Virtual, USA.

IV. Rodríguez-Campos, L., Mitchell, M. & Rincones-Gómez, R. 2020. A Model for Collaborative

a. Evaluations as a framework to foster a community of collaborators. New Directions for

b. Evaluation, 165, 17-27.

V. Rodríguez-Campos, Liliana. 2015. Collaborative Evaluations in Practice: Insights from Business, Nonprofit, and Education Sectors. Scottsdale, AZ: Information Age Publishing.

VI. Rodríguez-Campos, Liliana, and Rigoberto Rincones-Gómez. 2013. Collaborative Evaluations: Step-by-step, 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

VII. Blakemore, S.-J. (2012). Imaging brain development: The adolescent brain. NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 61(2), 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.080

VIII. Buelens, B., Burger, J., & van den Brakel, J. A. (2018). Comparing Inference Methods for Non-probability Samples. International statistical review, 86(2), 322-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12253

IX. Fetterman, D. M., Rodríguez-Campos, L., Wandersman, A., & O’Sullivan, R. G. (2014). Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation: Building a Strong Conceptual Foundation for Stakeholder Involvement Approaches to Evaluation (A Response to Cousins, Whitmore, and Shulha, 2013). The American journal of evaluation, 35(1), 144-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013509875

X. Kessi, S., Suffla, S., & Seedat, M. (2021). Decolonial Enactments in Community Psychology. Springer International Publishing AG.

XI. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2d ed. ed.). McGraw-Hill. http://ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00847a&AN=usflc.022015033&site=eds-live

XII. Pedhazur, E. J., & Pedhazur-Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

XIII. Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural studies (London, England), 21(2-3), 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353

XIV. Rodríguez-Campos, L. (2005). Collaborative evaluations : A step-by-step model for the evaluator. Llumina Press.

XV. Rodríguez-Campos, L., & Rincones-Gómez, R. (2013). Collaborative evaluations: Step by step. Stanford University Press.

XVI. Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2014). The future lies in uncertainty. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 345(6194), 264-265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251122

XVII. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, & Applications. Jossey-Bass.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Michael E. Mitchell, & Michelle Rincones-Rodríguez. (2022). A COLLABORATIVE EVALUATION APPROACH TO PSYCHOTHERAPY. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 8(11). Retrieved from http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/2585