A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION ON SOCIAL MEDIA: A STUDY ON TWITTER

Authors

  • Dr. Tarjeet Sabharwal Assistant Professor, Delhi College of Arts & Commerce, University of Delhi

Keywords:

Twitter, hastags, political communication, twittersphere, political participation, social media election

Abstract

In the age of digital world, social media is said to have an impact on the public sphere and communication in the society. Although it’s a microblogging site that only allows people to post a mini writing (140 characters), Political parties, politicians, supporters, etc. use it to spread not only information in general but also political opinions publicly through their networks. It also helps in the purpose of entering into direct dialogs with citizens and encouraging more political discussions.

This research takes into consideration three interrelated fields- in particular, politics, journalism, and media studies and explores how Twitter is utilized in the Indian political scenario. The advent of web-based content generating and sharing technologies, is considered critical for public political participation. This is so because new data and communication technologies, connect participatory holes as they encourage nearly anybody, with the right idea, a chance to dispense their perspectives.

The study aims to examine the extent of use of social media by the political parties to promote their image and political messages, among their supporters and peoples in social networking sites. This research intends to explore the efforts of social media use pattern and similarities in support for parties in the real world, relate it to the virtual environment and the effectiveness of social media as a platform for continuous dialogue with citizens in modern politics and its implications for the mainstream news media in India.

The Critical Discourse Analysis was used to investigate the role of Twitter in endorsing open politics online. Experimental confirmation assembled through collection, archiving and study of tweets has demonstrated the potential part of social media in encouraging political interest in India during the year 2017.

Qualitative analysis, using political discourse study has shown that Twitter was a site for ideological clash, which dispersed any attempt to classify the space as another public sphere. The unreasonable idea of communication on Twitter, together with ideological clashes demonstrated that Twitter was to a greater extent a public space and not public sphere. To further detect the sentiments in political tweets based on the semantic rules, sentiment analysis approach has been adapted.

References

I. Ahmed, W. (2017). Using Twitter as data source: An overview of social media research tools. Retrieved from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/05/08/using-twitter-as-a-data- sourcean-overview-of-social-media-research-tools-updated-for-2017/

II. ANI. (2016). PM Modi to address 16th edition of “Mann Ki Baat” on Sunday. Times of India. Retrieved from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/PM-Modi- to-address-16th-edition-of-Mann-Ki-Baat-onSunday/articleshow/50726987.cms Anwar,J,Shrinivasan,R (2012). ‘The year social media came of age in India’,The Times of India,31December,viewed 23July 2013,Available from: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-12-31/social- media/36078534_1_social-media-tweetflash-mob Blogworks (2013). ‘Blogworks most mentioned political leaders’

III. Basu, N. (2015, June 26). Modi and the media. Retrieved from http://www.thehoot.org/mediawatch/media-practice/modi-and-the-media-8331 Blackledge, A. (2009). Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World (1st ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

IV. Bimber, B. (1998) “Toward an Empirical Map of Political Participation on the Internet.” Paper

V. Blogworks,9 July, viewed 23 July 2013,Available from: http://www.blogworks.in/post/political-leaders-may 2013/#twitter

VI. Calafell & Delgado, (2004). Reading Latina/o images: Interrogating Americanos. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 21 (1), 1-21.

VII. Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., & Coulthard, M. (1995). Texts and practices readings in critical discourse analysis. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.

VIII. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–266.

IX. Chaudhauri,A (2012). ‘The Indian case for embracing social media:it’s now or never!’, 4ps Business and Marketing,vol VII,no.12,pp-66

X. Cobb, R., Ross, J.-K., & Ross, M. H. (1976). Agenda builing as a comparative political process. American Political Science Review, 70(1), 126–138.

XI. Coleman, S. (2013). The Internet and the opening up of political space. In J. Hartley,

XII. J. Burgess, & A. Bruns (Eds.), A companion to new media dynamics (pp. 375–384). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

XIII. Dutton, W. H. (2009). The Fifth Estate emerging through the network of networks. Prometheus, 27(1), 1– 15. doi:10.1080/08109020802657453

XIV. Editorial, available on http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/10/opinion/social-media-in- indian presented at the Annual Meeting of the Americal Political Science Association, Boston, Massachusetts.

XV. Fairclough (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (1st ed.). New York: Longman.

XVI. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=qaYqjaEHqPUC&pg=PA39&lpg=PA39&dq=R hetorical+Criticism+of+Online+Discourse&source https://docs.google.com/document/d/16AfQmXy- uia8K5OvpfnYQMxjfXrV2uWHCtCXfLdwPlc/edit https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/image-building https://www.forbes.com/sites/ronakdesai/2017/05/15/how-indias-leaders-tweet-with- purpose/#425ba1fb9cc2

XVII. https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/the-twitter-revolution/297958 https://www.socialbakers.com/statistics/twitter/profiles/india/society/politics/ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542?src=recsys IRIS Knowledge Foundation IKF (2013), Social media & Loksabha elections,10 April, viewed 21 July 2013,Available from www.esocialsciences.org/General/A2013412184534_19.pdf

XVIII. Konnelly, A. (2015). #activism: Identity, affiliation, and political discourse-making on Twitter. The Arbutus Review, 6(1), 1–16. doi:10.18357/ar.konnellya.612015 McKee, A. (2005). Textual Analysis: A Beginner's Guide (1st ed.). London [u.a.]: Sage Publications

XIX. Nair,P (2013). ‘Internet users in India to triple by 2016’, Business standard, 25 April, viewed 22 July 2013,Available from: http://www.business- standard.com/article/technology/internet-users-in-india-totriple-by-2016- 113042500185_1.html

XX. Social Media in Indian Politics, January 9, 2014, The New York Times, The Opinion Pages

XXI. Sumeet (2013). ‘ Whether real world or social media, Modi is number 1’, IBTL, 3 July, viewed 23 July 2013,Available from: http://www.ibtl.in/news/exclusive/2087/whether-real-world-or-social-mediamodi-is- number-1

XXII. Wodak, R. (2011). Critical Discourse Analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis (pp. 38-53). London, England: Continuum

Additional Files

Published

15-08-2017

How to Cite

Dr. Tarjeet Sabharwal. (2017). A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION ON SOCIAL MEDIA: A STUDY ON TWITTER. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 3(8). Retrieved from http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/2418

Most read articles by the same author(s)