BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS SATISFACTION, ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING ROLE OF MOTIVATION

Bhasker Malu, Dr. K. Jayasankara Reddy

Abstract


The self-determination theory (Ryan &Deci, 2000), states that an individual has innate basic psychological needs, which are constantly moving towards selffulfillment. Self-motivation along with basic psychological needs affect the academic performance of an individual. The focus of this study was to understand whether
intrinsic, extrinsic or amotivation played the role of mediators in the relationship between basic psychological needs satisfaction and academic performance. The basic psychological needs satisfaction-general and the academic motivation scale were administered. The academic performance was measured by scores of the participant on the I.C.S.E. The data was analyzed using correlation and regression analysis. The results showed that none of the three motivation sub types, mediated the relationship between basic psychological needs satisfaction and academic performance. However, basic needs satisfaction was positively related to intrinsic motivation and negatively to amotivation, providing partial support to the SDT.


Keywords


intrinsic motivation, extrinsic, amotivaiton, and academic performance.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afzal, H., Ali, I., Khan, M. A., & Hamid, K. (2010, April). A study of University Students' Motivation and its relationship with their academic performance. International journal of business and management.

Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). Intrinsic Motivation, extrinsic motivation, and academic achievement among Indian adolescents living in Canada and India. Social Psychology of Education, 427-439.

Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 397-413.

Ayub, N. (2010, July). Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on academic performance. Pakistan business review.

Baard, P. B., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A Motivational Basis of Performance and Well-Being in Two Work Settings. Journal of AppliedSocial Psychology, 2045-2068.

Bao, X.-h., & Lam, S.-f. (2008, march/april). Who Makes the Choice? Rethinking the Role of Autonomy and Relatedness in Chinese Children’s Motivation. Child Development, Volume 79, 79, 269 – 283.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Direction. Contemporary Educational Society, 54-67.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self Determination of Behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 227–268.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006, Ferbruary 2016). Self Determination Theory. Retrieved July 6, 2015, from Self Determination Theory Web site: http://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/basic-psychological-needs-scale/

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Springer US.

Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and Motivation a literature review. System, 165-174.

Edmunds, J., Ntoumanis, N., & Duda, J. L. (2006). A Test of Self-Determination Theory in the Exercise Domain. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2240–2265.

Edrak, B. B., Yin-Fa, B. C., Gharleghi, B., & Seng, T. K. (2013). The Effectiveness of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: A Study of Malaysian Amway Company’s Direct Sales Forces. International Journal of Business and Social Science.

Financial Express. (2015, May 18). ICSE and ISC 2015 class 10th, 12th results declared; pass percentage at 98.49. Retrieved from Financial Express Web site: http://www.financialexpress.com/article/india-news/isce-and-isc-2015-class-10th-12th-results-declared-pass-percentage-at-98-49/73632/

Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., & Bargmann, K. (2003). Autonomy Support and Need Satisfaction in the Motivation and Well-Being of Gymnasts. Journal of Applied Sports Psychology, 372-390.

Gunnell, K. E., Crocker, P. R., Wilson, P. M., Mack, D. E., & Zumbo, B. D. (2013). Psychological need satisfaction and thwarting: A test of Basic Psychological Needs Theory in physical activity contexts. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 599-607.

Hashemian, M., & Soureshjani, K. H. (2011). The Interrelationship of Autonomy, Motivation,and Academic Performance of Persian L2 Learners in Distance Education Contexts. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 1, No. 4, 319-326.

Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process Modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes. com/public/process2012.pdf

Johnston, M. M., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Measuring basic needs satisfaction: Evaluating previous research and conducting new psychometric evaluations of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 280–296.

Lai, E. R. (2011, April). Motivation: A Literature Review Research Report. Retrieved from Pearson assessments Web site: http://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/ tmrs/Motivation_Review_final.pdf

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom. Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 133–144.

Podlog, L., Gustafsson, H., Skoog, T., Gao, Z., Westin, M., Werner, S., & Alricsson, M. (2015). Need satisfaction, motivation, and engagement among high-performance youth athletes: A multiple mediation analysis. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.

Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological Needs and the Facilitation of Integrative Processes. Journal of Personality.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54-67.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 68-78.

Ryan, R. M., & Powelson, C. L. (1991). Autonomy and Relatedness as Fundamental to Motivation and Education. The Journal of Experimental Education, 49-66.

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C. B., & Vallières, É. F. (1992). er.uqam. Retrieved July 7, 2015, from Université du Québec à Montréal web site: www.er.uqam.ca/nobel/r26710/LRCS/scales/emes_en.doc

Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Luyckx, K. (2006). Autonomy and relatedness among Chinese sojourners and applicants: Conflictual or independent predictors of well-being and adjustment? Motivation and Emotion, 273-282.

Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., Witte, H. D., & Broeck, A. V. (2007). On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 251-277.

Zhou, M., Ma, W. J., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The importance of autonomy for rural Chinese children's motivation for learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 492-498.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2020 INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH JOURNAL