A STUDY TO ASSESS THE KNOWLEDGE REGARDING FAMILY VALUES AMONG PEOPLE RESIDING IN SUB URBAN COMMUNITY AT MEERUT
Keywords:
Family, Family values, Knowledge, ResidingAbstract
Family is where our roots take hold and from there we grow. A sense of belonging is derived from the strong bond of family. Family bonds are a link to our beginning and a guide to our future. Objective of the study was To assess the knowledge regarding family values among people. The population included in family values among people residing in sub urban community at Meerut. Sample size included in the study was 100 families residing sub urban area in community. Purposive sampling technique was used for data collection. The study was conducted in selected people residing in sub urban area Multan nagar Meerut. Result of the study was the family values among family members it shows that family members had average value (7%) and had more value (93%). On the basis above findings the conclusion of the study, deficiency of knowledge in family regarding family values. There was have more family value among family members residing in sub urban community area.
References
I. Shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in>bitstream
II. https://www.eccyclopedia.com
III. www.pitlanemagazine.com
IV. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/family-structure
V. ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4439&context=etd
VI. https://family.lovetoknow.com/about-family-values/types-family-structures
VII. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/definition/c1626
VIII. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4649868
IX. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/family-structure
X. https://www.scoe.org/files/ccpc-family-structures.pdf
XI. https://family.lovetoknow.com › About Family Values
XII. Doherty W, Baird M: Family Therapy and Family Medicine. New York: Guilford Press, 1983.Google Scholar
XIII. Christie-Seeley J: Working With the Family in Primary Care. New York: Praeger, 1984.Google Scholar
XIV. Bowen M: Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson, 1978.Google Scholar
XV. McGoldrick M, Gerson R, & Shellenberger S: Genograms Assessment and Intervention (2nd Edition). New York: WW Norton, 1999.Google Scholar
XVI. Jolly W, Froom J, & Rosen M: The genogram. J Fam Prac 1980;2:251–255.Google Scholar
XVII. Hill R: Family Development in Three Generations. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman, 1970.Google Scholar
XVIII. Duvall EM: Marriage and Family Development. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1977.Google Scholar
XIX. Cherlin, a. j. (2001). "the transformation of motherhood." in public and private families: an introduction, ed. a. j. cherlin. boston: mcgraw-hill.
XX. Coontz, s. (2001). "what we really miss about the 1950s."in family in transition, 11th edition, ed. a. s. skolnick and j. h. skolnick. boston: allyn and bacon.
XXI. Galinsky, e. (1999). "what children think about theirworking parents." in ask the children, ed. e. galinsky. new york: harpercollins.
XXII. Grimsley, k. d. (2000). "making family a priority." washington post weekly, may 8.
XXIII. Hochschild, a. r. (1996). "the emotional geography ofwork and family life." in gender relations in public and private, ed. l. morris and e. s. lyon. new york: macmillan.
XXIV. Lasch, c. (1977). haven in a heartless world: the familybesieged. new york: basic books.
XXV. Stacey, j. (1999). "the family values fable." in americanfamilies: a multicultural reader, ed. s. coontz. new york: routledge.
XXVI. Wolfe, a. (1998). "the culture war within." in one nation, after all, ed. a. wolfe. new york: viking penguin.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Education and Research Journal (IERJ)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
