A CASE STUDY: INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS AFFECTING LECTURERS’ RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT IN A UNIVERSITY IN MEKONG DELTA REGION, VIETNAM

Authors

  • Huynh Thanh Tien Director of Resource Center for Community Development, An Giang University, Vietnam
  • Joanna Higgins Associate Dean Research, School of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand,
  • Nguyen Thanh Hai PhD student of Vietnam National Academy of Educational Management
  • Huynh Thanh Viet Lecturer of the Faculty of Information Technology, An Giang University, Vietnam

Keywords:

institutional factors, leadership, research engagement, research environment, teaching loads

Abstract

This case study investigated institutional factors affecting university lecturers’ research engagement in a multidisciplinary higher education institution in the Mekong Delta region, Vietnam. The study employed the interpretive qualitative case study approach with the use of three data collection tools (document analysis, surveys, and recorded semi-structured interviews). In this paper, the authors presented the findings of document analysis and the recorded semi-structured interviews. The findings indicated that institutional factors affecting lecturers’ research engagement in this studied university included governmental policies, funding and structure, resources, teaching loads, leadership and research environment. The paper suggested some recommendations to foster the lecturers’ research engagement in this university.   

References

I. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

II. Blackburn, T., Bieber, J., Lawrence, J., & Trautvetter, L. (1991). Faculty at work: Focus on research, scholarship and service. Research in Higher Education, 32(4), 385. doi: 10.1007/BF00992183

III. Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. G. (2005). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine, 30(3), 225-237. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200503000-00006

IV. Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2012). University teacher educators' research engagement: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 347-356. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.011

V. Braxton, J. M., Luckey, W., & Helland, P. (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship into colleges and universities through Boyer's four domains (1st ed.). San Fransico: Jossey-Basse.

VI. Chen, Y., Gupta, A., & Hoshower, L. (2006). Factors that motivate business faculty to conduct research: An expectacy theory analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 179-189. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.81.4.179-189

VII. Chen, Y., Marry, R. N., Ashok, G., & Leon, H. (2010). Research productivity of accounting faculty: An exploratory study. American Journal of Business Education, 3(2), 101-113. doi: http//:dx.doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v3i2.389

VIII. Creswell, J. W. (1986). Measuring Faculty Research Performance. San Francisco Jossey Bass.

IX. Dundar, H., & Darrell, R. L. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607-631. doi: 10.1023/A:1018705823763

X. Fabel, O., Hein, M., & Hofmeister, R. (2008). Research productivity in business economics: An investigation of Austrian, German and Swiss Universities. German Economic Review, 9(4), 506-531. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2008.00451.x

XI. Fairweather, J. S. (1993). Faculty reward structures: Toward institutional and professional homogenization. Research in Higher Education, 34(5), 603-623. doi: 10.1007/BF00991922

XII. Hardre, P. L., Beesley, A. D., Miller, R. L., & Pace, T. M. (2011). Faculty motivation to do research: Across disciplines in research-extensive universities. The Journal of the Professoriate, 5(1), 35-69.

XIII. Hassan, A., Tymms, P., & Isamil, H. (2008). Academic productivity as perceived by Malaysian academics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(3), 283-296. doi: doi.org/10.1080/13600800802155184

XIV. Huang, J. S. (2014). Building research collaboration networks - An interpersonal perspective for research capacity building. Journal of Research Administration, 45(2

XV. Hunter, D., & Kuh, G. (1987). The "write wing": Characteristics of prolific contributors to the higher education literature. Journal of Higher Education Economics, 58(4), 443-462. doi: doi.org/10.2307/1981317

XVI. Huynh, T. (2016). Vietnamese Academics' Research Capacity in Tertiary Contexts. Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/xmlui/handle/10063/5141

XVII. Jones, A., Burgess, T. A., Farmer, E. A., Fuller, J., Stocks, N. P., Taylor, J. E., & Waters, R. L. (2003). Building research capacity: An exploratory model of GPs' training needs and barriers to research involvement. Australian Family Physician, 32(11), 955- 958.

XVIII. Jeans, R., & Murphy, L. (2009). Investigating academic's motivation to pursue research activity. Newport CELT Journal, 2, 17-28.

XIX. Jung, J. (2012). Faculty research productivity in Hong Kong across academic disciplines. HIgher Education Studies, 2(4), 13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n4p1

XX. Moore, J. (2015). Socio-Ecological Model: Looking Beyond the Individual. from http://www.balancedweightmanagement.com/TheSocio-EcologicalModel.htm

XXI. Sarunya, L. (2008). An investigation of factors related to research productivity in a public university in Thailand: A case study. (PhD Thesis), Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia, Melbourne.

XXII. Tien, F. F. (2008). What kind of faculty are motivated to perform research by the desire for promotion? Higher Education, 55, 17-32. doi: 10.1007/s10734-006-9033-5

XXIII. The Personnel Office. (2017). Annual Report 2017.

XXIV. Vietnam Government. (2000). Project “Training scientific and technical staff overseas with the state budget” (Quyết định số 322/2000/QĐ-TTg). Ha Noi.

XXV. Vietnam Government. (2001). Vietnam's educational development strategy in 2001-2010. (201/2001/Decision-Prime Minister). Hanoi: Retrieved from http://moj.gov.vn/vbpq/en/Lists/Vn%20bn%20php%20lut/View_Detail.aspx?ItemID=10345.

XXVI. Vietnam Government. (2005). Nghị quyết về đổi mới cơ bản và toàn diên giáo dục đại học Việt Nam giai đoạn 2006-2020 (Resolution on Basic and Comprehensive Innovation for Higher Education in Vietnam in the period of 2006-2020). Ha Noi: Office of Prime Minister Government Retrieved from http://dangcongsan.vn/cpv/Modules/News/NewsDetail.aspx?co_id=28340670&cn_id=518857#.

XXVII. Vietnam Government. (2008). Teaching and learning foreign languages in the national education system in the period 2008-2020. (No. 1400/Decision-Prime Minister, dated on September 30, 2008). Ha Noi: Retrieved from http://jpf.org.vn/iwtcore/uploads/2012/08/1-3Decision_1400_QD-TTg-Eng.pdf.

XXVIII. Vietnam Government. (2010a). Project 911 - "Training college and university lecturers to achieve PhD degrees in 2010-2020. Prime Minister, Government of Vietnam.

XXIX. Vietnam Government. (2010b). Vietnamese university charter. (58/2010/Decision - Prime Minister). Ha Noi.

XXX. Vietnam Government. (2012). The strategy for science and technology development for the 2011-2020 period. Vietnam: Retrieved from http://www.most.gov.vn/Desktop.aspx/Details-Article/ST-stratergy/The_translation_is_for_reference/.

XXXI. Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training. (2005). Vietnam higher education renovation agenda period 2006-2020, Resolution No.14/2005/NQ-CP on the fundamental and comprehensive reform of higher education in Vietnam 2006–2020.

XXXII. Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training. (2008). Framework on academics' working time. Ha Noi: Retrieved from http://thuvienphapluat.vn/archive/Quyet-dinh-64-2008-QD-BGDDT-Quy-dinh-che-do-lam-viec-doi-voi-giang-vien-vb82446.aspx.

XXXIII. Vietnam Ministry of Science and Technology. (2012). The strategy for science and technology development for the 2011-2020 period. (No.418/QD-TTg). Ha Noi: Retrieved from http://www.most.gov.vn/Desktop.aspx/Details-Article/ST-stratergy/The_translation_is_for_reference/.

XXXIV. Wood, F. (1990). Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff. Higher Education, 19, 81-100. doi: 10.1007/BF00142025

Additional Files

Published

15-09-2019

How to Cite

Huynh Thanh Tien, Joanna Higgins, Nguyen Thanh Hai, & Huynh Thanh Viet. (2019). A CASE STUDY: INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS AFFECTING LECTURERS’ RESEARCH ENGAGEMENT IN A UNIVERSITY IN MEKONG DELTA REGION, VIETNAM . International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 5(9). Retrieved from http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/1878