VIRTUAL REALITY AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING IN STEM
Keywords:
virtual reality, pedagogy, problem-based learning, undergraduate, STEMAbstract
In the last decade, virtual reality (VR) has seen dramatic advances that have allowed
VR technology to become integrated in business, education, and homes around the world. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) employs headsets and computer software to create an artificial environment containing three-dimensional images in which the user perceives full immersion. Individual virtual reality accessory devices allow the user to interact with the computer-generated environment and manipulate objects within the virtual setting. Immersive virtual reality is a mainstay in the gaming industry, with many new virtual reality games being released each month on multiple gaming systems. Gradually, the education research literature is accumulating evidence on the positive effects of the use of virtual reality technologies in educational settings with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines and special education leading the way. Widespread usage of virtual reality in STEM must involve the development of readily accessible virtual reality subject-specific software and clear pedagogical plans and measurement systems designed to ensure fulfillment of virtual
reality-based objectives (VROs) in the laboratory and classroom. A fusion of inquiry-focused learning strategies such as problem-based learning and virtual reality modules will improve virtual reality usage and student outcomes. Exploration of problem-based learning, potential uses, and limitations of virtual reality technology as well as the health hazards associated with integrating immersive virtual reality in STEM courses will be highlighted. The references provide a poignant starting point for interested educational researchers and STEM faculty.
References
I. Barron, B. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271-311.
II. Beach, J., & Wendt, J. (2015). Using virtual reality to help students with social interaction skills. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 16, 26-33.
III. Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green.
IV. Domingo, J., Bradley, E., & Gates, E. (2018). Education student perceptions of virtual reality as a learning tool. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46, 329-342.
V. Ganesh, C., & Smith, J. (2017). Using multiple high-impact practices to improve student learning in an undergraduate health science program. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 17, 74-84.
VI. Hsu, W., Tseng, C., & Kang, S. (2018). Using exaggerated feedback in a virtual reality environment to enhance behavior intention of water-conservation. Educational Technology & Society, 21, 187-203.
VII. Huang, H., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. (2010). Investigating learners' attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55,
-1182.
VIII. Huang, Y., Backman, S., Backman, K., McGuire, F., & Moore, D. (2019). An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: A self-determination theory. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 591-611.
IX. Hutchison, A. (2018). Using virtual reality to explore science and literacy concepts. Reading Teacher, 72, 343-353.
X. Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1515-1529.
XI. Kaufmann, H. (2009). Virtual environments for mathematics and geometry education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2, 131-152.
XII. Kaufmann, H., & Meyer, B. (2009). Physics education in virtual reality: An example. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2, 117-130.
XIII. Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2017). A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 10, 85-119.
XIV. Kilmon, C., Brown, L. Ghosh, S., & Mikitiuk, A. (2010). Immersive virtual reality simulations in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31, 314-317.
XV. Ludlow, B. (2015). Virtual reality: Emerging applications and future directions. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 34, 3-10.
XVI. Magaki, T., & Vallance, M. (2017). Measuring reduction methods for VR sickness in virtual environments. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 7, 27-43.
XVII. Makransky, G., & Lilleholt, L. (2018). A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 1141-1164.
XVIII. Markowitz, D., Laha, R., Perone, B., Pea, R., & Bailenson, J. (2018). Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-20.
XIX. Mayrose, J. (2012). Active learning through the use of virtual environments. American Journal of Engineering Education, 3, 13-18.
XX. Moro, C., Štromberga, Z., Raikos, A., & Stirling, A. (2017). The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10, 549-559.
XXI. Overton, T., & Randles, C. (2015). Beyond problem-based learning: Using dynamic PBL in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 251-259.
XXII. Panteldis, V. (2009). Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2, 59-70.
XXIII. Parong, J., & Mayer, R. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 785-797.
XXIV. Pfandler, M., Lazarovici, M., Stefan, P., Wucherer, P., & Weigl, M. (2017). Virtual reality-based simulators for spine surgery: A systematic review. Spine Journal, 17, 1352-1363.
XXV. Stepan, K., Zeiger, J., Hanchuk, S., Del Signore, A., Shrivastava, R., Govindaraj, S., & Iloreta, A. (2017). Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology, 7, 1006-1013.
XXVI. Webster, R. (2016). Declarative knowledge acquisition in immersive virtual learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 1319-1333.
¬¬¬
XXVII. Weyhe, D., Uslar, V., Weyhe, F., Kaluschke, M., & Zachmann, G. (2018). Immersive anatomy atlas-empirical study investigating the usability of a virtual reality environment as a learning tool for anatomy. Frontiers in Surgery, 5, 1-8.
XXVIII. Xin, B., Chen, G., Wang, Y., Bai, G., Gao, X., Chu, J., Xiao, J., & Liu, T. (2018). The efficacy of immersive virtual reality surgical simulator training for pedicle screw placement:
A randomized double-blind controlled trial. World Neurosurgery, 18, 32913-32919.
XXIX. Yildirim, G., Elban, M., & Yildirim, S. (2018). Analysis of use of virtual reality technologies in history education: A case study. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4, 62-69.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Education and Research Journal (IERJ)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
