• Dr. Priti Srivastava Principal, Kamal Institute of Higher Education and Advance Technology
  • Vrinda Saran Scholar (B. Ed.), Kamal Institute of Higher Education and Advance Technology


Critical Thinking, Education, Evaluation, Pedagogue, Reformation


Education being a lifetime process is dynamic and vulnerable to social, political and cultural positioning of its system. This nature in not a very distinctive manner, is also found in human beings, and is rather an imperative feature of human evolution. The propensity of education in its real sense goes far beyond acquisition of certain facts or a degree and has effects to the formation and changes brought about in human nature and personality. Critical thinking in the this paper is presented as an approach which is important for both the pedagogue, to be equipped with while transacting the curriculum and also for learners to engage in a broader perspective of things and be discriminative of their environment, both in negative and positive ways, even neutral when needed. The paper concludes with a proposal for reformation in the very aims, nature and process of examination system in the country in order to mark an eventual cessation to the practices like regurgitating and unreasoned articulation.


I. Bartlett, J. E. (2002). Analysis of motivational orientation and learning strategies of high school business students. Business Education Forum, 56(4), 18–23.

II. Biggs, J. B. (1987) Student approaches to studying and learning. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

III. Broadbear, J. T. (2003). Essential elements of lessons designed to promote critical thinking.

IV. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(3), 1–8.

V. Brown, M. N., & Kelley, S. M. (1986). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical

VI. thinking, 7th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

VII. Duplass, J. A., & Ziedler, D. L. (2002). Critical thinking and logical argument. Social Education, 66(5), 10–14.

VIII. Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 179–186.

IX. Facione, Noreen C. and Facione, Peter A : Critical Thinking Assessment and Nursing Education Programs: An Aggregate Data Analysis. The California Academic Press. Millbrae, CA 1997

X. Facione, P.A., Facione N. C., and Giancarlo, C: The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skills, Journal of Informal Logic, Vol. 20 No. 1 (2000) 61-84.

XI. Garrison, D. R. (1992) Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: an analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3) 136-148.

XII. Gaukroger, S.(2003). Descartes, René in L. Nadel (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science ,Vol 1. London :Macmillian.

XIII. Lipman, M. (1991) Thinking in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

XIV. McGregor Debra (2007). Developing Thinking, Developing Learning. Open University Press,9

XV. Paul, R. (1989). Regarding a definition of critical thinking. Paper presented at the International Conference on Critical Thinking and Educational Reform‟s 25th conference, Rohert Park, CA, United States of America.

XVI. Rippen, A., Booth, C., Bowie, S., & Jordan, J. (2002). A complex case: Using the case study method to explore uncertainty and ambiguity in undergraduate business education. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(4), 429.

XVII. Rogoff, B. (1990) Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive developments in social context, New

XVIII. York: Oxford University Press.

XIX. Srivastava, P. & Saran, V (2018). A Teacher Is A Teacher Not A Panacea. International Education and Reaseach Journal, Vol 4, No 2 (2018).

XX. Tempelaar, D. T. (2006). The role of metacognition in business education. Industry and Higher Education, 20(5), 291–297.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Dr. Priti Srivastava, & Vrinda Saran. (2018). CRITICAL THINKING: CRITICAL PEDAGOGUE AND EVALUATION. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 4(9). Retrieved from