• Majid Shmsiny Ghiasvand Master of Private Law, Anzali Islamic Azad University


According to the principle of contracts freedom, the principle of autonomy requires that the contract's parties can conclude the contract in any way they wish. And in this way they are not obliged to choose the prefabricated forms in conditions, works, as well as the guarantee of the performance of the contracts. And they can include any condition which they would in accordance with (Article 10 of the Iran Civil Code): Provided that it does not be against the law or contrary to the nature of the contract. One of these conditions, which the parties are inserted while contracting with the aim of ensuring the implementation of commitments, is penalty clause condition which is of great importance in jurisprudence and law of Iran. According to research conducted and the fact that the nature of penalty clause is damages in Iran's law and jurisprudence, as well as the question that whether modification possibility of penalty clause exists in Iranian law and jurisprudence or not, it should be said: Contrary to the jurisprudence's views, referring to negation of intolerable hardship rule (Osr Va Haraj) and modification possibility of penalty clause, Iran's legislative policy is in line with the French law in favor of the prohibition on penalty clause's modification. And the fact that whether there is possibility of damages excessive to the penalty clause in Iran's law or not, is not possible in the law of Iran due to the research conducted and it is possible in jurisprudence.


A: Books

Emami, Seyyed Hassan, Civil Rights, Islamiyah Publications, 1st Volume, 1370.

Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jafar, Law of Terminology, Golshan Publications, 2001.

Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jafar, Law of Obligations, Tehran University Press, 1st Volume, 2003.

Hossein Nejad Hosseinagholi, Civil Responsibility, Shahid Beheshti University Press, 2001.

Khomeini, Rouhollah, Islamic Publications Isteftaat, Hadaf press, 1375.

Samavati, Heshmat, ... Damages caused by failure to perform contractual obligations, third line .1390.

Safaii, Seyyed Hossein, Emami, Asadollah, Family Law, Tehran University Press, 1st Volume, 1389.

Qa'im Moghami, Abdul Majid, Obligations Law, Tehran University Press, 1st Volume, 2004.

Katouzian, Nasser, General Rules of Contracts, Publication, 1st Volume, 2009.

Katouzin, Nasser, General Theory of Obligations, Mizan publication.1389.

B: Articles

- Imami, Asadollah, Abdi, Sadegh, High School Complex Magazine of Qom, Analysis of Legal Principles of Non-Responsibility Condition Contract, NO. 2,1378.

- Haeri, Seyyed Kazem, Ahlul-Bayt jurisprudence magazine, jurisprudential review of cash bills, NO. 19 and 20, 1387.

- Hosseinabadi, Amir, Journal of religious teachings, investigating the penalty clause stipulated in the contract, No. 6, 1381.

Sharian, Sattari, Ibrahim, The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Tabriz University, Comparative Study of Payments in Contracts, NO. 13,1384.

- Qurbanwand, Mohammad Baqer, Lawyers Association Magazine, Analysis of the position of penalty clause in contracts, NO. 81 and 82, 1385.

- Kashani, Mahmoud, Civil Rights Leaflet 5, Shahid Beheshti University Law School press, 2007.

- Vahdati Shobeiri, Seyyed Hassan, Journal of Humanities Methodology, Damage to Delinquency, NO. 36,1382.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Majid Shmsiny Ghiasvand. (2018). MODULATION AND ANALYSIS OF PENALTY CLAUSE IN IRAN’S LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE . International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 4(2). Retrieved from