“CORPORAL PUNISHMENT” A NEED FOR CONTEXTUALIZATION: HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS’ RESPONSE IN MANIPUR

Authors

  • Dr. Manilei Serto Assistant Professor, D. M. College of Arts, Imphal

Keywords:

corporal punishment, child rights, teachers, discipline, Manipur

Abstract

Corporal punishment has been a form of punishment in the schools of India and still continues to thrive today in many places inspite of the declarations by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), which was set up in March 2007, the National Policy on Education,1986 (modified 1992), and many other declaration of corporal punishment in India and the world under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In the case of Manipur though the various provisions against corporal punishment seems to be effective among the schools, there has been reported incidents of the continued application of punishment by teachers. The study has found out the reason of this continuation through the high school teachers’ responses regarding the prohibition of corporal punishment in Manipur. The paper highlights the need for a contextual analysis to the general understanding of corporal punishment in schools as in regard to Manipur.

References

I. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Right(CESCR): Supplement No. 2, 2001, United Nations, New York and Geneva www.un.org/documents/ecosoc/docs/2001/e2001-22.pdf

II. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), General Coment No.13, The Right to Education (Art.13), 1999 www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838c22.pdf

III. Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989 (entry into force from 2 September 1990 in accordance with Article 49). www.ohchr.org

IV. Ending Legalised Violence Against Childern: Global Reort 2008, published by Global Initiative to and all Corporal Punishment of Children www.endcorporalpunishment.org

V. National Charter for Children, 2003, Government of India http://childlineindia.org.in/National-Charter-for-Children-2003.htm

VI. National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), 2007-2013, Government of India www.ncpcr.gov.in/view_file.php?fid=407

VII. National Plan of Acton for Children, 2005, Department of Women and Child Development, Government of India http://www.childlineindia.org.in/National-Plan-of-Action-2005.htm

VIII. National Policy on Education 1986 (as modified in 1992) with National Policy on Education, 1968, Government of India www.ncert.nic.in/oth_anoun/npe86.pdf

IX. Statistical Handbook of Manipur - 2017, Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Government of Manipur

X. The Right of the Children to Free and Complusory Education Bill, 2008, Bill No. LXV of 2008 (Lok Shaba), http://nuepa.org/Download/rightfreeeducation%20bill.pdf

XI. UN Committee on the Rights of the Child: General Comment No. 8 (2006) http://www.refworld.org/docid/460bc7772.html

XII. UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

Additional Files

Published

15-11-2017

How to Cite

Dr. Manilei Serto. (2017). “CORPORAL PUNISHMENT” A NEED FOR CONTEXTUALIZATION: HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS’ RESPONSE IN MANIPUR. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 3(11). Retrieved from http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/1413