• Ms. Rupam Priya Ph.D Scholar, JamiaMillia Islamia, New Delhi.
  • Dr. Shalini Yadava Assistant Professor, University School of Education, GGSIP University, New Delhi.


Scientific Literacy, Process Skills, Curriculum Reform


The present paper is an attempt to look at the present status of school science textbooks at elementary stage with respect to the content they cover, their focus with respect to achieving the basic objectives of science teaching and to understand how the content drives the pedagogy employed by the teachers. It also throws light on the relevance of a science textbook to emphasise critical areas of scientific literacy along-with the need to understand science as a process. The paper further identifies the categories on the basis of which Science Textbooks should be analysed to understand the weaknesses and strengths of the current science textbooks at Elementary stage.


I. Chiappetta, Eugene L., Fillman, David A.,& Sethna, Godrej H. (1991). A Method to Quantify Major Themes of Scientific Literacy in Science Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.28, No.8, p713-25, 1991.

II. Gupta, H. O. (1994). Trends in Elementary School Science Education: A Survey, Indian Educational Review, p139-147, 1994.

III. Haefner, Leigh Ann (2004). Learning by doing? Prospective elementary teachers’ developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, vol.26, No.13, p1653-1674, 2004.

IV. Kishore, Lalit, (2003). Science of Science Education: The Pedagogical Centricity. School Science, 2003.

V. Koul, Ravinder & Dana, Thomas M. (1997). School Science in India:Curriculum Developers/Textbook Authors' Perspectives. Electronic Journal of Science Education, vol.2, No.2, p1-15, 1997.

VI. Linn, Marcia C. (1992). Science Education Reform: Building on the Research Base – by the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

VII. Newberry, Matthew, Gilbert John,& Hardcastle, David (2005). Visualizing progression through the Science curriculum in order to raise standards. School science review, vol.86, No.316, p87-96, 2005.

VIII. Ramanthan, S., & Siddiqi, N. (1994). Representation of Science in Upper Primary Science Textbooks: An Assessment. Indian Educational Review, vol.29, No.1-2, p1-11, 1994.

IX. Rowell, Patricia M. (2004). Shaping School Science: Competing Discourses in an Inquiry based Elementary Program. International Journal of Science Education, vol.26, No.8, p915-934, 2004.

X. Shah, Mir Zaman (2009). Exploring the conceptions of a science teacher from Karachi about the nature of Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, vol.5, No.3, p305-315, 2009.

XI. Shymansky, James A,& Kyle, Jr. William C. (1994). Establishing a Research Agenda: Critical Issues of Science Curriculum Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 29. p749-778, 1994.

XII. Yager, Robert E. (1983). The Importance of Terminology in Teaching K-12 Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.20, No.6, p577-588, 1983.

Additional Files



How to Cite

Ms. Rupam Priya, & Dr. Shalini Yadava. (2017). ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCIENCE TEXTBOOKS: A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS. International Education and Research Journal (IERJ), 3(7). Retrieved from http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/1200

Most read articles by the same author(s)